Skip to main content

Security report for netatwork.de

Net at Work GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Net at Work GmbH is a German technology company specializing in Microsoft solutions such as Microsoft 365, Teams, Security, SharePoint, and Exchange. The company positions itself as an experienced Microsoft Solutions Partner, offering consulting, migration, managed services, and change management to enable modern, secure digital workplaces. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting business customers seeking Microsoft-based collaboration and security solutions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern theme and plugins, including Borlabs Cookie for GDPR-compliant cookie consent and Google Analytics for tracking. Security posture is good with HTTPS and cookie consent, but lacks visible advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partial due to missing explicit privacy and terms of service pages. WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with the business location and domain usage. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained, with room for improvement in privacy transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching netatwork.de

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention netatwork.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for netatwork.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Net at Work operates in the technology sector with a focus on Microsoft enterprise solutions. Their business model is B2B consulting and managed services, targeting medium-sized to large enterprises in Germany. They leverage their Microsoft Solutions Partner status and extensive project experience to build trust and market presence. The company actively publishes news, blogs, and webcasts to engage customers and prospects. Their partnership ecosystem includes Microsoft and possibly other technology providers. The website content and structure support lead generation and customer education. Growth indicators include active content updates and event announcements. The company emphasizes change management as a differentiator to ensure successful technology adoption.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism in place. However, there is no visible security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure information. Security headers are not evident in the provided data, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party plugins and scripts requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate risks. GDPR compliance is partial, lacking explicit privacy policy details. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly documented. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a corporate website but could be enhanced with better transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement and display a formal security policy and incident response contact information.
  3. Add security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and third-party scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency on data retention and user privacy practices to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Net at Work GmbH
Description
Net at Work GmbH is a technology company specializing in Microsoft solutions including Microsoft 365, Microsoft Teams, Security, SharePoint, and Exchange. They provide consulting, migration, managed services, and change management to enable modern workplace collaboration and security.
Key services
Microsoft 365 Migration, Microsoft Teams and Telephony, Security Consulting and SOC, Managed Services, Change Management, Custom Software Development, Power Platform Readiness
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Enfold Theme 7.1.3, Borlabs Cookie plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (G-6Y0G33VE6B), Instagram Feed plugin, WPForms plugin
Frameworks
PHP (WordPress backend), Avia Framework (Enfold theme)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Borlabs Cookie
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and targets business customers for Microsoft technology solutions.
  3. Strong emphasis on Microsoft 365, Teams, Security, and related services.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Borlabs Cookie plugin with integration to Google Analytics and Tag Manager.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  6. Social media presence is active on Twitter, Xing, LinkedIn, Instagram, and YouTube.
  7. Multiple news articles and blog posts indicate active content management and updates.
  8. Website uses WordPress CMS with Enfold theme and several plugins.
  9. No direct email addresses or phone numbers explicitly labeled in the provided content; contact likely via contact page.
  10. Security headers and advanced security policies are not visible in the provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 using the Enfold theme and several plugins including Borlabs Cookie for consent management and WPForms for forms. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading images and deferred scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but DNS uses anycast nameservers. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for the business use case, though improvements in security headers and privacy documentation are recommended to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with netatwork.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review netatwork.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.