Skip to main content

Security report for nespresso.com

Nespresso · Retail

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The overall security posture of the website is solid, with no critical or high-level vulnerabilities detected, indicating a generally stable and secure environment. The site scores exceptionally well in SSL/TLS implementation (100/100) and network security (100/100), reflecting strong encryption and robust network defenses. However, medium-level issues in security headers, GDPR compliance, NIS2 alignment, and DNS health suggest gaps that could expose the business to regulatory risks, reduced trust, and potential attack vectors. The failure in security headers means the site may be missing protections against common web threats such as clickjacking or MIME-type sniffing. GDPR and NIS2 analysis failures highlight non-compliance risks that could result in legal penalties and affect customer trust, especially in EU markets. DNSSEC not being enabled and missing CAA records increase susceptibility to DNS spoofing or unauthorized certificate issuance. While email security is strong, the complexity of SPF records could lead to configuration errors affecting email deliverability. Addressing these medium issues will enhance security posture, compliance, and customer confidence without significant resource investment.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of nespresso.com. View the latest report
3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching nespresso.com

This scan found 4 issues across 3 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Email security
95
DNS health
85
Network security
100
Average
95
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nespresso.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
270,356
Employees
56
Customers
270,053
Third parties
247
Weak passwords
13%

Latest record dated 2026-06-15 · 137 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for nespresso.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –nespresso.com2026-06-15
  • –nespresso.com2026-06-13
  • –www.nespresso.com2026-06-13
  • –nesclub.nespresso.com2026-06-06
  • –www.nespresso.com2026-06-06

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Technical notes

Notes

Security headers analysis failed, indicating missing or misconfigured HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS, which can leave the site vulnerable to cross-site scripting, clickjacking, and protocol downgrade attacks. GDPR and NIS2 compliance failures highlight inadequate controls or documentation related to data privacy and critical infrastructure security, potentially leading to legal and operational risks. DNSSEC is not enabled, exposing the domain to DNS spoofing and cache poisoning attacks, while the absence of CAA records allows any certificate authority to issue SSL certificates for the domain, increasing the risk of certificate mis-issuance. Email security is strong with a 95/100 score, but the SPF record's complexity may cause validation issues, potentially affecting email deliverability and reputation. SSL/TLS and network security are fully compliant with best practices, scoring 100/100, ensuring encrypted communications and robust network defenses.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 84/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nespresso.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nespresso.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.