Skip to main content

Security report for neonmedia.fi

Neonmedia Oy · Transportation · Finland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Neonmedia Oy is a Finnish company specializing in providing media devices and real-time information solutions for public transportation. Established in 2000, it holds a leading position in Finland's public transportation media sector, offering services such as real-time progress tracking and passenger information systems. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting transportation operators and stakeholders within Finland. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Visual Composer and uses modern web technologies including Google Fonts and FontAwesome. The hosting and domain registration are managed by Planeetta Internet Oy, a Finnish provider, ensuring local infrastructure support. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Privacy and cookie policies are not found, indicating a gap in compliance with GDPR best practices. Overall, the website is functional, well-designed, and credible but would benefit from improved security and privacy disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching neonmedia.fi

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention neonmedia.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for neonmedia.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Neonmedia Oy operates primarily in the transportation sector, focusing on B2B solutions for public transportation media and passenger information. Its market position as the largest provider in Finland suggests a strong competitive advantage and established client base. The business model revolves around supplying hardware and software solutions to transit authorities and operators. The company appears to maintain a focused niche with specialized offerings, likely generating revenue through contracts and service agreements. The absence of extensive contact information on the website may indicate a preference for direct client relationships or controlled communication channels. The partnership with Planeetta Internet Oy for domain and hosting services reflects a localized operational approach. Growth opportunities may include expanding digital services or integrating with broader smart city initiatives.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of DNSSEC implementation and absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options expose potential risks to DNS spoofing and clickjacking attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found, indicating good maintenance practices. The missing privacy and cookie policies, along with no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, highlight compliance and transparency gaps. These factors could impact trust and regulatory adherence, especially under GDPR and NIS2 frameworks. Enhancing security headers, publishing comprehensive privacy documentation, and establishing clear incident response contacts would significantly improve the security maturity and compliance posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish detailed privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  4. Establish and publicize an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy with dedicated contact channels.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Neonmedia Oy
Registration number
1017307-9
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Neonmedia Oy
Description
Neonmedia on Suomen laajin joukkoliikenteen medialaitteiden sekä reaaliaikaiseen etenemistietoon, matkustajainformaatioon liittyvien ratkaisujen toimittaja.
Key services
Public transportation media devices, Real-time progress information solutions, Passenger information systems
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, CSS, Google Fonts (Roboto), FontAwesome
Frameworks
Visual Composer
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No DNSSEC
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage or metadata
  4. WHOIS registrant address is partial and no phone/email provided
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with Visual Composer and Rank Math SEO plugin
  6. No DNSSEC configured
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet
  10. Content is in Finnish language with English language tags
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Visual Composer framework and enhanced with plugins such as Rank Math SEO for search engine optimization. It leverages modern web fonts and iconography via Google Fonts and FontAwesome. Hosting appears to be managed by Planeetta Internet Oy, consistent with the domain registrar, suggesting a stable and localized hosting environment. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the use of multiple CSS and JS assets. Accessibility features are basic but present. Technical debt appears low, though improvements in security configurations and privacy compliance are needed to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with neonmedia.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review neonmedia.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.