Skip to main content

Security report for neoncrm.com

Neon One · Non-profit · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Neon One is a software company specializing in providing comprehensive software solutions tailored for nonprofit organizations. Their platform aims to help nonprofits scale their impact and achieve sustainability through donor management, fundraising, and event management tools. The company positions itself as a leading provider in the nonprofit software ecosystem, targeting nonprofit organizations as its primary audience. Founded in 2016, Neon One has established a medium-sized presence with a professional and consistent brand image. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages a variety of modern marketing and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer, Pardot, Drift, and AdRoll. The site is hosted with Cloudflare DNS and uses HTTPS, ensuring secure communications. The website demonstrates good SEO and mobile optimization, although accessibility features appear basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain management best practices, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent implemented but no visible privacy policy or terms of service in the provided HTML. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in its market segment.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of neoncrm.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching neoncrm.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Neon One operates in the nonprofit software sector, offering SaaS solutions that integrate donor management, fundraising, and event management functionalities. Their market positioning as a leading provider is supported by a consistent brand and a comprehensive software ecosystem. The business model is subscription-based software services targeting nonprofit organizations. The company leverages partnerships with marketing automation and analytics platforms to enhance customer engagement and conversion. The absence of direct contact information on the homepage suggests a focus on inbound digital marketing channels. The company maintains active social media profiles on Facebook and LinkedIn, reinforcing its market presence. The domain age and WHOIS data align with the company's founding date, indicating a stable and legitimate operation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, uses domain status locks to prevent unauthorized domain changes, and implements a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting a baseline security posture. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice to protect against DNS spoofing. The absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options in the HTML source is a security gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The extensive use of third-party scripts and marketing tools increases the attack surface and necessitates regular security audits. No evidence of incident response policies, vulnerability disclosure, or security certifications was found, indicating potential areas for improvement in security governance and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service documents to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish and publicize incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and marketing tools to minimize risks from external dependencies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Neon One
Description
Scale your impact and achieve maximum sustainability with Neon One, the leading provider of nonprofit software and services.
Key services
Nonprofit software solutions, Donor management, Fundraising tools, Event management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress CMS, jQuery, Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), CookieYes (cookie consent), Wistia (video hosting), Drift (chatbot/live chat), Pardot (marketing automation), AdRoll (retargeting)
Frameworks
Yoast SEO plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO)
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, AdRoll
Tracking pixels
Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), LinkedIn Pixel, AdRoll
Marketing tools
Pardot, Drift, Wistia
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-branded for nonprofit software services
  2. Extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics tools
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage HTML
  4. Cookie consent mechanism implemented via CookieYes
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content
  6. WHOIS data shows domain is well-managed and not privacy protected
  7. No security headers explicitly detected in HTML source
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery and various marketing and analytics integrations such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer, Pardot, Drift, and AdRoll. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and DNS services. The site shows moderate performance with good mobile optimization and SEO practices, including use of Yoast SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD). Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. The extensive use of third-party scripts requires careful management to avoid performance degradation and security risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence but could benefit from improvements in security headers and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100 +24Medium26 findingsView report
  2. 49/100High24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with neoncrm.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review neoncrm.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.