Skip to main content

Security report for nenavistnasitich.cz

Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Nenávist na sítích' is a Czech research project focused on analyzing hate speech, particularly gender-based hate directed at women politicians on social media platforms like Facebook. It is affiliated with reputable organizations such as Multikulturní centrum Praha, Fórum 50 %, Transparency International, ČVUT, and EEA Grants, indicating a credible non-profit research initiative. The site provides detailed visual data and analysis on the prevalence and impact of hateful comments, aiming to raise awareness and inform policy or social interventions. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including Nuxt.js and Tailwind CSS, ensuring a responsive and visually appealing user experience. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile-optimized, though accessibility features are basic. SEO practices are adequately implemented with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS but lacks several security headers that could enhance protection against common web threats. No forms or data collection mechanisms were detected, reducing exposure to input-based vulnerabilities. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR regulations. Overall, the domain WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits trust assessment from a registration standpoint. Despite this, the website content and affiliations suggest legitimacy. The site does not contain adult or NSFW content and targets a general audience interested in social research and human rights. Strategic recommendations include adding comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, improving security headers, and providing clear contact and incident response information to enhance transparency and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nenavistnasitich.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nenavistnasitich.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for nenavistnasitich.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project operates in the non-profit sector focusing on social research related to digital hate speech and human rights. Its market positioning is niche, targeting academics, policymakers, and civil society interested in online hate and gender issues. The business model appears to be grant-funded research, supported by partnerships with established organizations. Revenue streams are likely limited to grants and institutional support. The target customer segments include researchers, NGOs, and government bodies. Growth indicators are not explicit but the presence of multiple partners suggests a collaborative ecosystem. The project maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and quality content, though lacks direct business contact information.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced, which is mandatory. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of forms reduces attack surface but also limits user interaction. Compliance gaps include missing privacy and cookie policies, which are critical under GDPR. Incident response readiness is not evident due to lack of security contact information. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an informational site but could be improved to meet best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security or abuse contacts for incident response.
  4. Conduct regular security audits to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Projekt "Digitální doba a hrozby pro lidská práva" reaguje na nové výzvy současného světa internetu a zaměřuje se na prostředí online sociálních sítí, v němž se odehrává prolínání lidských práv s právy digitálními. Nové technologie a přístupy ke komunikaci přináší i riziko porušování těchto práv způsoby, které nemusí být snadno odhalitelné a není tak jednoduché je sankcionovat jako jejich porušování v offline světě.
Key services
Research and analysis of hate speech on social media, Mapping categories of gender-based hate speech, Identification of mechanisms of hate speech spread
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Tailwind CSS, Vue.js, Nuxt.js
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a research project focused on digital hate speech and human rights.
  2. Content is in Czech language and well-structured with visual data presentations.
  3. No contact or privacy policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust assessment.
  5. No signs of malicious or adult content detected.
  6. No visible forms or data collection mechanisms detected in HTML.
  7. No external analytics or advertising scripts detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with Nuxt.js (Vue.js framework) and Tailwind CSS for styling, enabling responsive and performant web pages. The site is hosted with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communication. Performance is moderate with some large inline styles but no obvious blocking scripts. No CMS detected, indicating a custom or static site generation approach. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in accessibility and security headers are recommended to enhance robustness and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nenavistnasitich.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nenavistnasitich.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.