Skip to main content

Security report for nebconcrete.net

Naples Executive Builders · Real Estate · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Naples Executive Builders is a well-established, family-owned concrete, masonry, and shell contracting company based in Naples, Florida, with over three decades of experience. The company specializes in foundational and structural construction services for residential and commercial projects, positioning itself as a leading contractor in Collier County. Their website reflects a professional and trustworthy business with detailed service offerings, client testimonials, and transparent contact information. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tools, optimized for SEO and accessibility, and employs HTTPS with good security practices, though DNSSEC is not enabled. Privacy and cookie policies are present and compliant with GDPR standards. Overall, the security posture is solid with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but there is room for improvement in security headers and incident response disclosures. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, enhancing credibility and trust. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing a security.txt file to improve vulnerability disclosure and incident response readiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nebconcrete.net

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the Real Estate sector, focusing on construction services related to concrete and masonry. It targets builders, developers, and project managers in the Naples area, leveraging a strong local reputation and long-term client relationships. The business model is service-oriented, delivering specialized construction solutions with a focus on quality and safety. Revenue streams likely come from residential and commercial contracts. The website's content and testimonials indicate a mature business with a stable market position. Partnerships include a web development firm (exploritech) and social media presence on Facebook. Growth indicators include a comprehensive portfolio and client endorsements. The company maintains licensing and certifications relevant to its industry.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. Use of privacy and cookie consent plugins indicates awareness of compliance requirements. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents potential areas for enhancement. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. The site uses reputable plugins and scripts, minimizing risk from vulnerable libraries. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional hardening and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to reduce vulnerability risks.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Naples Executive Builders
Registration number
CBC LIC #1258995
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Naples Executive Builders
Description
Naples Executive Builders, a leading concrete, masonry, and shell contractor in Naples, FL specializes in slabs, structural concrete, and custom builds. Family-owned with over three decades of experience, providing quality, efficiency, and integrity in residential and commercial construction.
Key services
Concrete Footings & Slabs, Masonry Block Construction, Elevated Concrete Beams & Decks, Grade Beams & Composite Steel Decks, Structural Steel Columns & Beams, Driveways & Sidewalks
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Slick Slider, Yoast SEO, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Contact Form 7, Cookie Law Info plugin, UserWay Accessibility Widget
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of security and privacy plugins (Cookie Law Info, Contact Form 7 with validation)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained
  2. Clear and detailed service descriptions
  3. Multiple client testimonials enhance trust
  4. Contact information is transparent and complete
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and compliant
  6. No evidence of security incidents or vulnerabilities in content
  7. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  8. No WAF or blocking detected, full content accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Slick Slider, and Google Tag Manager. It uses Google Fonts and Typekit for typography, and several plugins for SEO (Yoast), contact forms (Contact Form 7), cookie compliance, and accessibility (UserWay). The site is mobile optimized and accessible with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting is inferred via the registrar Tucows and nameservers at websiteservername.com. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and caching likely in place. The site uses HTTPS with a valid certificate. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and DNSSEC configuration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nebconcrete.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nebconcrete.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.