Skip to main content

Security report for navispherecarrier.com

C.H. Robinson · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Navisphere Carrier is a digital platform associated with C.H. Robinson, a major global logistics and transportation company. The platform appears designed to serve carriers and logistics partners, facilitating freight management and transportation services. The website is built using modern web technologies such as React and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy or possible proxy/privacy protection issues. The website links to official C.H. Robinson privacy and terms pages, reinforcing its corporate affiliation. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is functional but could improve transparency and compliance aspects.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching navispherecarrier.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform targets carriers and logistics providers, fitting within the transportation sector. As part of C.H. Robinson's ecosystem, it benefits from the parent company's market position and brand recognition. The business model focuses on providing a digital freight management solution, likely generating revenue through service fees or platform usage. The integration of advanced marketing and analytics tools suggests a focus on customer engagement and data-driven operations. The lack of direct contact information on the landing page may indicate a controlled access model or reliance on corporate channels. Strategic partnerships appear limited to the parent company and associated domains.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The extensive use of third-party tracking and marketing scripts without an explicit cookie consent mechanism may pose privacy compliance risks under GDPR. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, indicating potential gaps in security governance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with better header configurations, transparency, and compliance mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a clear cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations, especially given the extensive use of tracking scripts.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
C.H. Robinson
Description
Navisphere Carrier is a platform related to C.H. Robinson, a global logistics company providing transportation and supply chain services. The website targets carriers and logistics partners to facilitate freight and transportation management.
Key services
Freight management, Carrier services, Logistics platform
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Marketo, Adobe Launch, FullStory, Branch.io, Braze, Datadog, Azure Maps
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
FullStory, Marketo, Datadog
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Marketo, FullStory, Braze, LaunchDarkly, Datadog, Kampyle
Marketing tools
Marketo, Braze, LaunchDarkly, Kampyle
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a React-based single page application with dynamic content loading.
  2. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the landing page.
  3. Privacy and terms links redirect to chrobinson.com corporate site.
  4. No visible forms on the landing page; modals for terms acceptance and notifications present.
  5. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts loaded.
  7. No explicit cookie consent banner detected despite tracking scripts.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No security headers visible in provided data.
  10. WHOIS data unavailable, raising legitimacy questions.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a React-based single page application leveraging multiple third-party services for marketing, analytics, and user engagement. The tech stack includes Marketo, Adobe Launch, FullStory, Braze, Branch.io, and Datadog, indicating a sophisticated digital marketing and monitoring setup. Performance appears moderate with deferred script loading and preconnect hints. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO optimization is minimal with no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. The lack of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are notable technical gaps. Overall, the infrastructure is modern but could benefit from improved security and compliance configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with navispherecarrier.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review navispherecarrier.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.