Skip to main content

Security report for nastezky.eu

ZO ČSOP "Natura, quo vadis?" · Non-profit · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

31/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Na stezky, pro všechny!' is a small-scale non-profit project focused on promoting and providing accessible educational nature trails in Prague. It aims to enhance environmental awareness and accessibility for all visitors, including seniors and wheelchair users. The project is supported by local government bodies and environmental organizations, positioning it as a trusted community initiative. The website content is primarily in Czech and provides detailed information about various trails, including maps and accessibility evaluations. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, and Modernizr. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking. The site is hosted by WEDOS Internet, a reputable Czech hosting provider. While the design and content quality are good, the site lacks HTTPS, which is a significant security concern. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS and security headers reduces the site's security posture. No privacy policy or terms of service are published, which impacts GDPR compliance. The cookie consent banner is present, indicating some awareness of privacy requirements. No forms or sensitive data collection points were detected, reducing immediate risk exposure. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with room for improvement. The overall risk is moderate given the non-commercial nature of the site and limited data collection. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, publishing privacy and security policies, adding security headers, and enhancing privacy compliance. These steps will improve user trust and regulatory adherence while reducing potential vulnerabilities.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nastezky.eu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
31

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project operates as a non-profit environmental education initiative targeting residents and visitors in Prague interested in nature and accessible outdoor activities. Its competitive advantage lies in its focus on accessibility and environmental interpretation of local trails. Revenue streams appear to be grants and sponsorships from government and private entities. The partnership ecosystem includes local environmental organizations and disability advocacy groups, enhancing credibility and outreach. Growth indicators are modest but stable, with ongoing support from municipal and environmental bodies. The business model is community and grant-funded, focusing on social impact rather than profit.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic with critical gaps such as lack of HTTPS and missing security headers. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking but no advanced privacy controls are evident. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, indicating limited security governance. The absence of privacy and terms policies is a compliance risk under GDPR. No forms or user input points reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement features. Overall, the site requires foundational security improvements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance security governance.
  5. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts and provide clear user consent mechanisms.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ZO ČSOP "Natura, quo vadis?"
Description
Projekt zaměřený na naučné stezky v Praze, které interpretují přírodní a kulturní bohatství prostředí, s cílem zpřístupnit tyto stezky i osobám s bariérami.
Key services
mapové výstupy bezbariérové průchodnosti naučných stezek, komentované vycházky, publikace metodik pro seniory a vozíčkáře
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery 1.11.2, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Modernizr 2.8.3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
35/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small non-profit project focused on educational nature trails in Prague.
  2. Content is in Czech language and well structured with clear navigation.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  5. No HTTPS detected in provided URL, which is a critical security issue.
  6. No security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  7. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for visitor tracking.
  8. Contact information limited to one email address without phone or physical address.
  9. No forms present on the homepage to analyze for data collection.
  10. Website design and content quality are good for a small project.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, leveraging jQuery and Modernizr for compatibility and feature detection. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for analytics purposes. Hosting is provided by WEDOS Internet, a known Czech hosting provider. The site lacks HTTPS, which is a critical technical deficiency. Performance is moderate with no evident optimization for mobile beyond basic responsiveness. Accessibility features are minimal but present. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site does not use a CMS or modern frameworks, indicating a simple static or custom-built site.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nastezky.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nastezky.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.