Skip to main content

Security report for nasaragroup.com

Nasara Group · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nasara Group is a Latvian company specializing in the wholesale and retail of wooden pallets, wood pellets, briquettes, mineral fertilizers, and food products. They also provide comprehensive transport services including air, road, and sea cargo across Europe and beyond. The company targets agricultural, trading, logistics businesses, and retail chains, positioning itself as a reliable regional supplier with a large warehouse and diverse product offerings. The website is built on Joomla CMS and uses modern frontend technologies such as Swiper.js and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and provides clear navigation and professional content. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and CSRF tokens in forms, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The domain registration is consistent with the business age and location, indicating legitimacy. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy business presence with room for improvement in privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nasaragroup.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nasara Group operates in the transportation, manufacturing, and retail sectors, focusing on pallets and wood fuel products. Their business model combines product sales with logistics services, serving both wholesale and retail customers. The company demonstrates growth potential with a broad product portfolio and European delivery capabilities. Customer testimonials and detailed contact information enhance trust. The absence of privacy policies and limited security headers suggest compliance and security maturity gaps. The company leverages partnerships with Latvian price comparison and product search platforms, indicating active market engagement. The domain age and registration details align well with the company's stated founding year, supporting credibility.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens in forms, which are positive security practices. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no evidence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The site does not appear to be behind a WAF or security challenge, and no vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, DNSSEC, and privacy compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Establish and publicize a security policy and incident response contact channels to enhance trust and preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities and improve security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nasara Group
Description
Nasara Group is a company specializing in the sale and distribution of wooden pallets, wood pellets, wood briquettes, mineral fertilizers, and food products. They offer transport services worldwide including air, auto, and sea cargo. Their products are targeted at agricultural companies, trading companies, transport and logistics companies, and retail chains.
Key services
Wooden pallets sales, Wood pellets and briquettes sales, Mineral fertilizers wholesale, Food products wholesale, Transport and logistics services (air, auto, sea cargo), Used pallets purchase
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Joomla CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • CSRF token present in forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly presented.
  4. Website uses Joomla CMS with modern frontend technologies.
  5. Security headers are missing or not detected in HTML content.
  6. Domain registration is recent but consistent with business age.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS, a widely used content management system, and uses modern frontend technologies including Swiper.js for sliders and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and content structure. Performance is moderate, with deferred CSS and JavaScript loading strategies observed. The domain is registered with Squarespace Domains II LLC and uses Latvian name servers. No DNSSEC is enabled, which is a technical gap. The site lacks explicit security headers, which is a technical risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a medium-sized business but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nasaragroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nasaragroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.