Skip to main content

Security report for naprokat.lv

NAPROKAT.LV · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Naprokat.lv is a small, young car rental company based in Riga, Latvia, offering a variety of popular car brands such as Audi, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Volvo with automatic transmissions. The business model focuses on convenient online booking without prepayment and delivery services within Riga, Jurmala, and Riga airport. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, supporting Russian, Latvian, and English languages to cater to a broad audience. Technical infrastructure leverages common frontend libraries like Bootstrap and jQuery, providing a responsive and user-friendly experience. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS usage implied but lacking visible security headers and advanced protections. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website presents a credible and functional business presence with room for security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching naprokat.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a competitive player in the Riga car rental market, emphasizing affordable pricing, convenience, and customer satisfaction. Its key competitive advantages include a diverse fleet of popular car brands, online booking without upfront payment, and delivery services. The target customers are individuals and travelers in Riga and surrounding areas seeking reliable car rental options. The business model relies on direct online reservations and customer service via phone and social media channels. Growth indicators include a young but growing company profile and active social media presence. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company maintains consistent branding and clear service descriptions, supporting trust and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. Forms use AJAX with recaptcha validation, enhancing input security, but no incident response or security policy pages are present. No DNSSEC information is available, and no vulnerability disclosure or data protection officer details are found. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms may impact GDPR compliance. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, the security posture would benefit from implementing recommended headers, policies, and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to demonstrate commitment to data protection and breach management.
  4. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain and improve overall security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NAPROKAT.LV
Description
Naprokat.lv предлагает низкие цены на аренду автомобилей с удобной онлайн резервацией, доставкой по Риге, Юрмале и аэропорту Рига. В ассортименте популярные марки Audi, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Volvo с автоматической коробкой передач.
Key services
Аренда автомобилей разных классов, Онлайн бронирование без предоплаты, Доставка автомобилей по Риге, Юрмале и аэропорту, Обслуживание и техническая поддержка автомобилей
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, Fancybox, Timepicki, Bootstrap Datepicker
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by base href https://naprokat.lv/)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Form submission via AJAX with recaptcha checks

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. Content is in Russian with options for Latvian and English languages.
  3. Business is a small car rental service operating in Riga, Latvia.
  4. Clear contact information and social media presence enhance trust.
  5. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit, limiting domain trust verification.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security policies found.
  8. Website uses common frontend libraries and frameworks for UI and UX.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  10. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard modern frontend technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, FontAwesome for icons, and plugins like Fancybox and Timepicki for enhanced UI components. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with no explicit hosting provider identified. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site build. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts indicates minimal user tracking. Technical debt appears low, but security improvements and accessibility enhancements are recommended to future-proof the platform and improve user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with naprokat.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review naprokat.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.