Skip to main content

Security report for napa.lv

Napa.lv · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Napa.lv is a Latvian-based company specializing in car rental and sales services, including a buyback option for vehicles. The company targets individuals and businesses in Riga and surrounding areas, offering a diverse fleet of vehicles for rent and sale. Their website presents a professional and user-friendly interface with clear contact information and business hours, indicating a well-established local presence. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies such as Svelte and Flatpickr, with Google Fonts integration and responsive design elements. The site performs moderately well with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. However, there is room for improvement in security practices, including the implementation of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data in the HTML source. Nonetheless, the absence of visible security headers and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts suggest a moderate security posture. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy. Overall, the site appears trustworthy and professionally managed but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures. The overall risk assessment is moderate with recommendations to improve security headers, implement GDPR-compliant cookie consent, and publish security policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching napa.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Napa.lv operates in the transportation sector, focusing on car rental and sales within Latvia, primarily in Riga. Their business model combines vehicle leasing with direct sales and buyback services, catering to a broad customer base including private individuals and businesses. The presence of multiple financial partners indicates a robust financing ecosystem supporting their operations. The company leverages partnerships with local banks and lenders to facilitate vehicle financing, enhancing customer accessibility. Market positioning is local and specialized, with a focus on competitive pricing and diverse vehicle offerings. Growth potential exists through expanding digital presence and improving compliance and security standards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency and preparedness. GDPR compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant certifications or trust seals to strengthen business credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Napa.lv
Description
Napa.lv is a Latvian company offering car rental and car sales services, including options for selling cars back to the company. They provide a variety of vehicles for rent and sale, targeting customers in Riga and surrounding areas.
Key services
Car rental, Car sales, Car buyback
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Svelte, Flatpickr, Bootstrap (implied by classes), Google Fonts (Inter)
Frameworks
Svelte
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URL)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Clear contact information including phone, email, and physical address provided.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR relevance.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies published.
  6. Business appears focused on local Latvian market with transportation services.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in HTML source.
  8. Partner logos indicate financial partnerships with local banks and lenders.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend framework (Svelte) combined with Flatpickr for date selection and Google Fonts for typography. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly, with a clean and structured layout. Performance is moderate, with no obvious heavy scripts or slow-loading elements detected. SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags and structured navigation. However, no CMS or backend technology is explicitly identified. Hosting provider details are not available from the HTML. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA attributes present but could be improved. The absence of analytics scripts suggests minimal user tracking, which aligns with privacy considerations but limits marketing insights.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with napa.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review napa.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.