Skip to main content

Security report for nammfoundation.org

NAMM Foundation · Non-profit · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The NAMM Foundation is a well-established non-profit organization dedicated to advancing music education and participation through philanthropic programs, research, and community engagement. Their website reflects a focused mission with multiple featured programs such as global grantmaking, career mobility initiatives, and educational resources. The organization targets educators, students, and music industry professionals, positioning itself as a key player in the music education non-profit sector. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 7 with a variety of contributed modules and uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and JW Player. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. However, some technical debt is evident due to the use of older jQuery versions and lack of visible security headers. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a baseline compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of WHOIS data due to privacy protection is typical for non-profits and does not detract from the site's legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by adding security headers and explicit incident response information. The website is trustworthy, safe for general audiences, and demonstrates a professional online presence consistent with its mission. Strategic recommendations include modernizing technical components, enhancing security headers, and publishing clear security and incident response policies to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nammfoundation.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NAMM Foundation operates as a non-profit focused on music education and industry support. Its market position is strong within the music education community, leveraging partnerships with NAMM and hosting recognized programs and awards. The foundation's business model centers on philanthropic giving, educational programming, and community engagement. Revenue streams likely include donations and grants. The target customer segments include educators, students, NAMM members, and philanthropists. Growth indicators include active program development and digital engagement through social media and events. The foundation maintains a partnership ecosystem with NAMM and related organizations, enhancing its reach and impact.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents a gap in best practices. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by cookie consent and privacy policy presence. Overall, the security culture appears adequate but could benefit from formalized policies and technical enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to current secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and stakeholders.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Continue enhancing privacy compliance by detailing data retention and user rights in privacy documentation.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NAMM Foundation
Description
The NAMM Foundation advances active participation in music making through scientific research, philanthropic giving and public service programs. It invests in music education, career mobility in music, and community engagement.
Key services
Global Grantmaking, Day of Service events, Career Mobility initiatives including scholarships and awards, Museum of Making Music, Best Communities for Music Education Award, K-12 Music Curriculum
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 7, jQuery 1.12, Google Tag Manager, JW Player, Colorbox, Typekit Fonts
Frameworks
Drupal CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Ads
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Drupal 7 CMS with multiple contributed modules
  2. Content is rich and focused on music education and philanthropy
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented
  4. No direct company emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact via form
  5. Social media presence on YouTube, Facebook, Twitter
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML content
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed request; domain likely uses privacy protection
  8. No signs of malware or phishing
  9. No terms of service page explicitly found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 7, a mature but aging CMS platform, with multiple contributed modules for functionality such as cookie compliance, colorbox, and entity reference. The tech stack includes jQuery 1.12, Google Tag Manager, JW Player, and Typekit fonts. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. Technical debt is present due to older libraries and lack of modern security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize the stack, improve performance, and enhance security configurations to reduce risk and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nammfoundation.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nammfoundation.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.