Skip to main content

Security report for naef-prestige.ch

Naef Prestige Knight Frank · Real Estate · Switzerland

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Naef Prestige Knight Frank is a luxury real estate brokerage operating in Switzerland, specializing in high-end properties such as chalets, villas, and apartments. The company leverages the strong Knight Frank brand to position itself as a leader in the Swiss luxury property market, targeting affluent individuals and investors seeking prestigious real estate. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with quality content focused on luxury real estate offerings. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using modern technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Google Maps API, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility is basic. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching naef-prestige.ch

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the luxury real estate sector in Switzerland, serving a niche market of high-net-worth clients. Its business model centers on brokerage services for buying, selling, and renting luxury properties. The association with Knight Frank enhances its market position and credibility. The website's content and structure support a premium brand experience, though the absence of visible contact details and compliance policies may limit user trust. The company likely generates revenue through commissions on property transactions. The partnership ecosystem includes Knight Frank as the parent brand. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website with multilingual support and integration of advanced marketing and analytics tools.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA integration to protect forms. However, it lacks visible security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for transparency and compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of explicit security headers may reduce protection against certain web attacks. Privacy compliance gaps, such as missing cookie consent and privacy policies, present regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate to strong but could be improved with better transparency and policy publication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details and consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement and publicly disclose an incident response plan and security contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve transparency.
  4. Review and add recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Ensure regular updates and security audits of WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Naef Prestige Knight Frank
Description
Naef Prestige Knight Frank - une référence dans l'immobilier des biens d'exception. Immobilier de luxe en Suisse. Propriétés de prestige, chalets, maisons, appartements de luxe à vendre.
Key services
Luxury property sales, Luxury property rentals, Real estate consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Google Maps API, Hotjar, reCAPTCHA, WP Rocket, Moment.js, Daterangepicker, intl-tel-input
Frameworks
WordPress, Visual Composer
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
AppNexus (secure.adnxs.com)
Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-branded with Knight Frank association
  2. No visible privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers explicitly labeled on the homepage HTML
  4. Use of multiple modern web technologies and analytics tools
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  6. No incident response or security contact information found
  7. Content is focused on luxury real estate in Switzerland
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Visual Composer, leveraging a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Maps API, Hotjar, and Google Tag Manager. Performance is moderate with caching via WP Rocket. Mobile optimization is good, supporting responsive design. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility is basic and could be enhanced. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site uses multiple external domains for fonts, analytics, and advertising. Technical risks include potential outdated plugins or missing security headers. Opportunities exist to improve privacy compliance and security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with naef-prestige.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review naef-prestige.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.