Skip to main content

Security report for nadacetipsport.cz

Nadace Tipsport · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nadace Tipsport is a Czech non-profit foundation established in 2017, focusing on environmental protection and regional development in the Berounsko region. The website serves as an informational platform to promote their initiatives and community support activities. The foundation targets the general public interested in environmental and regional issues. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme, incorporating modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. The site demonstrates good digital maturity with mobile optimization and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA, though additional security headers could enhance protection. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, though it lacks explicit contact and security policy information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nadacetipsport.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates in the non-profit sector with a clear focus on environmental and regional development projects. Its market position is regional and community-oriented, with key services including environmental initiatives and support for local people. The business model is grant and donation-based, typical for non-profits. The website reflects consistent branding and good content quality, supporting trust and engagement. Partnerships with services like Cookiebot and Google indicate a commitment to compliance and analytics. Growth potential lies in expanding community outreach and digital presence.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate bot traffic, indicating a baseline security awareness. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of several security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional controls and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Include explicit contact information (email, phone, physical address) to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from outdated software.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadace Tipsport
Description
Nadace Tipsport is a non-profit foundation focused on environmental and regional development projects in the Berounsko region, supporting people and community initiatives.
Key services
Environmental projects, Regional development, Community support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Enfold Theme, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented
  • Cookie consent with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (implied via Google Tag Manager)
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Enfold theme.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with Cookiebot, showing GDPR compliance.
  3. Google Tag Manager and Google reCAPTCHA are used for analytics and security.
  4. No explicit contact information (email, phone, address) found in the provided content.
  5. No terms of service page detected.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  8. Website content is in Czech language and focused on non-profit activities.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with the Enfold theme, a popular and well-supported framework. It leverages jQuery and integrates Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA scripts for analytics and security. Cookiebot manages cookie consent, indicating compliance with privacy laws. The site is mobile-optimized and uses modern web fonts loaded conditionally based on user consent. Performance is moderate, with multiple external scripts that may impact load times. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were identified. Hosting provider details are not explicit in the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nadacetipsport.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nadacetipsport.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.