Skip to main content

Security report for nadacesesterboromejek.cz

Nadace sester Boromejek · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nadace sester Boromejek is a Czech non-profit foundation dedicated to supporting individuals and organizations committed to helping others, particularly through the activities of the Boromejka sisters. The foundation facilitates financial and material donations, supports social and ecological projects such as the Hangáry Goretti initiative, and provides assistance to various charitable organizations. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with Elementor and Astra theme, featuring clear navigation and calls to action for donations. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube enhances outreach and trust. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies and includes Google Analytics and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS, ensuring secure communication. However, explicit security headers are not fully implemented, and no detailed security or incident response policies are publicly available. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain reduces trustworthiness from a registration perspective, though the website content and social media presence suggest legitimate operations. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in security headers and transparency. Privacy compliance is good with cookie consent mechanisms in place. The lack of explicit contact information and WHOIS data are notable gaps. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing detailed security and privacy policies, and verifying domain registration details to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nadacesesterboromejek.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates in the non-profit sector, focusing on charitable support and social projects in the Czech Republic. Its business model revolves around fundraising through financial and material donations, engaging donors, companies, and the community. The organization leverages digital channels including a well-structured website and social media platforms to reach its audience. The foundation's niche focus on Boromejka sisters and related social initiatives positions it uniquely in the charitable landscape. Partnerships with service providers like ngstranky.cz for design and Cookiebot for compliance indicate a professional operational approach. Growth potential lies in expanding donor engagement and enhancing transparency. Revenue streams primarily come from donations and corporate partnerships, with tax deduction incentives for companies. The foundation's market position is stable within its niche, supported by consistent content updates and community events. Strategic observations suggest focusing on improving digital trust signals and expanding outreach through enhanced security and compliance disclosures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness visibility. Compliance with GDPR is supported by cookie consent but could be strengthened with more comprehensive privacy and security documentation. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact channels for security issues. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with recommendations to enhance header implementation and policy transparency to elevate security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish detailed privacy and security policies on the website, including incident response procedures and contact information for security concerns.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve transparency and trustworthiness.
  4. Add explicit company contact information such as official emails and phone numbers to facilitate communication and support.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to maintain security and performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadace sester Boromejek
Description
Podporujeme ty, kteří se rozhodli pomáhat. Prostřednictvím Nadace sester Boromejek můžete podpořit činnosti sester Boromejek a neziskových organizací.
Key services
Financial donations, Material donations, Support for social and ecological projects, Project funding and assistance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Astra Theme, Google Analytics, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Elementor Marketing Buttons
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Czech non-profit foundation supporting charitable activities.
  2. Content is well structured and professionally presented.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on main page.
  4. Social media links are present and active.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented.
  6. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces trust score.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  8. No forms detected on the main page for direct contact or data collection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, indicating a modern and flexible infrastructure. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations. The site uses local fonts and optimized images, contributing to moderate performance. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and accessible navigation. However, some accessibility features could be improved, and security headers are not fully implemented. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical stack is standard for non-profit organizations, balancing ease of use with functional capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nadacesesterboromejek.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nadacesesterboromejek.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.