Skip to main content

Security report for nadacepropudu.cz

Nadace Pro půdu · Non-profit · Czech Republic

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 4 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nadace Pro půdu is a Czech non-profit foundation established in 2016, dedicated to ecological and sustainable agriculture by securing land for eco-farmers who practice environmentally friendly farming. The foundation operates by acquiring land and leasing it to small ecological farmers under long-term agreements, promoting soil health and local community benefits. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and the Divi theme, featuring rich content in Czech and clear navigation. It integrates common web technologies including jQuery, MediaElement.js, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel for tracking. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks explicit security headers and privacy/cookie policies, indicating room for compliance improvement. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. The domain registration data aligns well with the organization's profile, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is a good representation of a small non-profit with a clear mission and professional online presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nadacepropudu.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation occupies a niche position in the ecological agriculture sector in the Czech Republic, focusing on land access for small eco-farmers. Its competitive advantage lies in its network affiliations, such as the Access to Land European network, and its community-oriented approach. Revenue streams likely include donations and land management activities. The target customers are ecological farmers, donors, and environmental advocates. Growth indicators include partnerships with multiple ecological and agricultural organizations. The foundation's operations emphasize sustainability, education, and community engagement, positioning it as a trusted entity in its sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its security robustness. The use of reCAPTCHA is present but not fully configured, which may expose forms to spam or abuse. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small non-profit but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Configure and enable security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Properly configure reCAPTCHA with valid site keys to protect forms from spam and abuse.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nadace Pro půdu
Registration number
046 945 38
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadace Pro půdu
Description
Nadace Pro půdu is a non-profit foundation focused on ecological and sustainable agriculture by providing land to eco-farmers who care for the soil in an environmentally friendly manner. It supports small ecological farmers by securing land for them and promotes long-term ecological soil care and local community benefits.
Key services
Land acquisition and leasing to ecological farmers, Support and advisory for ecological farming practices, Community and educational projects related to sustainable agriculture
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, MediaElement.js, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Divi Theme
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of recaptcha scripts (though site_key empty)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with Divi theme and common JS libraries.
  5. Includes Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in provided data; SSL is enabled.
  7. No visible vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages.
  8. Business is a small non-profit focused on ecological farming and land access.
  9. Website content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Divi theme, leveraging jQuery and MediaElement.js for frontend functionality. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for user tracking and marketing analytics. The site is moderately performant with responsive design for mobile devices. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks beyond WordPress and standard JS libraries. Technical risks include outdated plugins or themes if not maintained and lack of security headers which could expose the site to certain attacks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nadacepropudu.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nadacepropudu.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.