Skip to main content

Security report for nadacepartnerstvi.cz

Nadace Partnerství · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nadace Partnerství is the largest Czech ecological foundation, established in 1991, supporting communities and organizations across the Czech Republic through grants, education, and expert advice focused on nature and sustainable development. The website is professionally designed, well-structured, and provides comprehensive information about their services, campaigns, and projects. Technically, the site uses ASP.NET WebForms with Kentico CMS, integrates Google Tag Manager and Analytics, and employs reCAPTCHA for form security. The security posture is good with HTTPS and consent-based cookie management, though some security headers could be improved. WHOIS data is missing, which slightly reduces trust but the website content and external references strongly support legitimacy. Overall, the site is a trustworthy, well-maintained digital presence for a reputable non-profit ecological organization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
45/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nadacepartnerstvi.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
45
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation holds a strong market position as a leading ecological non-profit in the Czech Republic, with over 4600 projects supported and half a billion CZK granted. Their business model revolves around grantmaking, education, and community support, targeting local communities, landowners, and ecological activists. They maintain partnerships with multiple related domains and run campaigns and awards to promote ecological awareness. The website content and structure reflect a mature organization with a clear mission and stable operations.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a baseline security awareness. Consent management for cookies is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and advanced security headers like CSP or X-Frame-Options are not evident. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The security score is good but could be enhanced by adding explicit policies and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies with contact information for reporting issues.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing direct contact emails and phone numbers for support and inquiries.
  5. Consider publishing WHOIS or domain registration information to improve trust and legitimacy perception.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadace Partnerství
Description
Jsme největší česká ekologická nadace. Poskytujeme granty na výsadby, vzděláváme v Otevřené zahradě, radíme vlastníkům půdy, ukazujeme inspirativní projekty.
Key services
Granty na výsadby stromů a ekologické projekty, Vzdělávání v oblasti ekologie a udržitelného rozvoje, Poradenství vlastníkům půdy, Organizace kampaní a soutěží, Podpora komunitních projektů
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
ASP.NET WebForms, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
ASP.NET
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Consent management for cookies and tracking
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional, well-structured non-profit ecological foundation site
  2. Content is comprehensive, focused on grants, education, and community projects
  3. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual but may be due to privacy or registry issues
  4. Uses modern web technologies and consent-based tracking
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  6. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet
  8. Multiple external partner domains linked
  9. No explicit security or incident response contact information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature ASP.NET WebForms platform with Kentico CMS, leveraging Bootstrap and jQuery for frontend responsiveness and interactivity. Google Tag Manager and Analytics are used for tracking, with consent mechanisms in place. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices. Performance is moderate, typical for CMS-driven sites with rich content. There is opportunity to modernize the tech stack and improve security headers to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nadacepartnerstvi.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nadacepartnerstvi.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.