Skip to main content

Security report for nadaceokd.cz

Nadace OKD · Non-profit · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nadace OKD is a Czech non-profit foundation dedicated to supporting social, environmental, and community projects primarily through grant programs. The foundation targets non-profit organizations and local communities, aiming to improve social care, leisure activities, and environmental conditions. The website reflects a medium-sized organization with a consistent brand presence and active social media engagement. Technically, the site uses a custom CMS with older JavaScript libraries and Bootstrap for styling, indicating moderate digital maturity. While the site is accessible and well-structured, it lacks modern security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, though partner and donor links support legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved by updating libraries, adding security headers, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nadaceokd.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation holds a strong regional position in the Czech Republic's non-profit sector, supported by notable partners such as OKD, Green Gas DPB, and financial institutions. Its business model revolves around grant distribution and community support, with a focus on social and environmental impact. The website content and partner ecosystem indicate stable operations and community trust. However, the lack of visible contact emails and phone numbers may limit direct engagement. The foundation's digital presence is professional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation to strengthen stakeholder confidence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, but no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML source, which could expose it to common web attacks. The use of outdated jQuery 1.8.2 poses potential security risks due to known vulnerabilities in older versions. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML, and no incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating a gap in security governance. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further weakens compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in technical controls and policy transparency to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Upgrade JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  4. Add explicit contact information for security incidents and data protection officer to improve incident response readiness.
  5. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility features to improve user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadace OKD
Description
Nadace OKD podporuje neziskové organizace, které pomáhají potřebným, zlepšují úroveň sociální péče, volnočasových aktivit i životního prostředí.
Key services
Grant programs, Support for social and environmental projects, Community engagement and events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.8.2, Bootstrap CSS/JS, Facebook SDK, Google Analytics (ga.js), jQuery UI 1.8.23, Fancybox
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied (site uses https URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on homepage.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating possible domain registration or WHOIS server issues.
  4. Site uses older JavaScript libraries (jQuery 1.8.2) which may have security vulnerabilities.
  5. Social media presence is strong with Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram links.
  6. No visible email addresses or phone numbers explicitly labeled as contact info.
  7. Contact address is clearly stated in footer.
  8. No security headers detected in HTML source.
  9. Google Analytics is used for tracking user behavior.
  10. Site uses HTTPS as indicated by URL but SSL configuration details unknown.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS named FOXFRAME, utilizing Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery 1.8.2 for client-side scripting. It integrates Facebook SDK and Google Analytics for social media and analytics purposes. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. The HTML is valid and well-structured, but the use of outdated libraries and lack of modern security headers indicate technical debt. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and enhance security configurations to align with current best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nadaceokd.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nadaceokd.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.