Skip to main content

Security report for nadaceju.cz

Nadace Jedličkova ústavu · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nadace Jedličkova ústavu is a Czech non-profit foundation established in 2002, dedicated to supporting children and young adults with physical and combined disabilities. The foundation focuses on promoting independence and social integration through educational support, personal assistance, barrier-free transportation, leisure activities, and medical aids. It operates primarily through donations, partnerships, and fundraising events, maintaining a strong presence in the Czech disability support sector. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear communication of its mission and activities. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with Yoast SEO and uses modern web technologies including jQuery and Google Fonts. It is hosted by WEDOS, a Czech hosting provider, and is optimized for mobile devices with good SEO practices. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and performance tuning. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and secure forms but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The WHOIS data confirms the domain's legitimacy and long-standing presence, supporting trustworthiness. Overall, the site is a credible and professional platform for a non-profit organization but should enhance privacy compliance and security headers to strengthen its security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nadaceju.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation holds a solid market position within the Czech Republic's non-profit sector focused on disability support. Its competitive advantage lies in its long history since 2002, diverse fundraising events, and strong partnerships with reputable companies and public institutions. Revenue streams are primarily from donations and event proceeds. The target customers include disabled children and youth, donors, and corporate partners. Growth indicators include active event promotion and social media engagement. The partnership ecosystem is broad, involving energy companies, media, and local government entities, enhancing credibility and resource access.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data leakage is observed. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. The lack of published privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident. The site uses standard WordPress and plugins, which require regular updates to mitigate risks. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with room for improvement in formal policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to address known vulnerabilities.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nadace Jedličkova ústavu
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadace Jedličkova ústavu
Description
Nadace Jedličkova ústavu is a foundation supporting children and people with physical or combined disabilities, focusing on promoting independence and social integration of young people with disabilities.
Key services
Educational support, Social integration programs, Barrier-free transportation funding, Personal assistance funding, Leisure activities support, Medical aids and therapies funding, Organizing fundraising events and campaigns
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.6.4, Google Fonts (Montserrat, Barlow), AOS (Animate On Scroll) library
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed non-profit foundation site focused on disability support.
  2. Content is comprehensive with detailed descriptions of services, events, and fundraising campaigns.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  5. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected except newsletter subscription via third-party iframe.
  7. Social media presence is strong with multiple official accounts linked.
  8. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is long-established.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking; full content accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is based on WordPress CMS version 6.8.2, leveraging Yoast SEO for optimization and jQuery for scripting. It uses Google Fonts for typography and AOS for animations. Hosting is provided by WEDOS, a Czech hosting provider, consistent with the domain registrar. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in loading times and accessibility. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with semantic HTML. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities if not updated and lack of advanced security headers. Modernization opportunities include implementing progressive web app features and enhanced caching strategies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nadaceju.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nadaceju.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.