Skip to main content

Security report for nadacecc.cz

Nadace člověk člověku · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nadace člověk člověku is a Czech non-profit foundation dedicated to supporting social and educational projects focused on children, families, and disadvantaged groups. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content in Czech. The foundation actively engages donors and partners, showcasing references and partner logos. Technically, the site is built on an ASP.NET WebForms platform using older JavaScript libraries, which may pose security risks. The presence of Google Tag Manager indicates moderate analytics and tracking capabilities. Security posture is moderate with cookie consent and GDPR compliance evident, but lacking modern security headers and updated libraries. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective. Overall, the website is functional and trustworthy for its non-profit mission but would benefit from technical and security improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nadacecc.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nadacecc.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
6
Employees
0
Customers
6
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for nadacecc.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates in the non-profit sector, focusing on grant awarding and social support projects. It targets donors, grant applicants, and social organizations within the Czech Republic. The business model relies on donations and partnerships, with a network of local partners and sponsors. The website content and references indicate a stable market position within its niche. The lack of detailed company registration data and contact information online suggests a focus on privacy or limited digital footprint. The partnership ecosystem is well represented by multiple local organizations and service providers. Growth indicators are not explicit but the active news and grant announcements suggest ongoing operations.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The site uses HTTPS (assumed but not confirmed by headers), implements cookie consent and GDPR policies, and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML. However, the use of outdated jQuery 1.7.2 introduces potential vulnerabilities. No security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, which are recommended best practices. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The absence of WHOIS data and security.txt reduces transparency. Overall, the site is functional but requires updates to libraries and security configurations to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Verify and enforce HTTPS across the entire site with strong TLS configurations.
  4. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies including security.txt.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadace člověk člověku
Description
Nadace člověk člověku is a foundation focused on supporting natural human help aimed at children and families, supporting projects in education, sport, healthcare, leisure activities for youth, and assistance for handicapped and socially disadvantaged people.
Key services
Grant awarding, Support for social projects, Fundraising collaboration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.7.2, Masonry JS, fancyBox 2.0.6, ASP.NET WebForms
Frameworks
ASP.NET WebForms
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  3. Uses outdated JavaScript libraries which may pose security risks.
  4. Cookie consent and GDPR policy are implemented properly.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Multiple partner domains linked and displayed with logos.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  8. No terms of service or incident response information found.
  9. Website uses ASP.NET WebForms technology stack.
  10. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ASP.NET WebForms with a custom CMS. It uses legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.7.2 and fancyBox 2.0.6, which are outdated and may contain vulnerabilities. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta tags and structured navigation but lacks advanced optimization. The hosting provider is not identified from the data. There is opportunity to modernize the tech stack and improve performance and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nadacecc.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nadacecc.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.