Skip to main content

Security report for nadace-landek.cz

Nadace LANDEK Ostrava · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nadace LANDEK Ostrava is a Czech non-profit foundation dedicated to preserving mining heritage and cultural traditions primarily in the Ostrava-Karviná and Moravian-Silesian regions. The foundation operates a grant program supporting projects related to mining monuments, cultural preservation, and education about mining history. The website reflects a small, regionally focused organization with a history dating back to 2007 and supported by regional government grants. Technically, the website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, hosted on Forpsi servers. It lacks advanced CMS or frameworks and shows basic mobile and accessibility features. There are no detected analytics or tracking technologies, indicating minimal user tracking. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (assumed from domain but not explicitly confirmed in content), but lacks security headers and published security or privacy policies. No contact information or incident response channels are provided, which limits transparency and user trust. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site content is fully accessible. Overall, the website is functional and serves its informational purpose but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and contact transparency to enhance trust and compliance with modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nadace-landek.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nadace-landek.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for nadace-landek.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation holds a stable position as a regional non-profit entity with a clear mission to support mining heritage and cultural projects. Its business model revolves around grant funding with structured multi-round application processes, targeting local communities, cultural organizations, and youth. The organization benefits from regional government support, which strengthens its legitimacy and funding stability. The website content and domain age support a mature presence in the sector. However, the lack of digital marketing, social media presence, and modern web features suggests limited digital engagement and outreach capabilities.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic with no explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosures. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates gaps in compliance and best practices. No evidence of vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data was found, but the lack of HTTPS confirmation and security headers reduces the overall security score. The organization should prioritize implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear contact channels for security incidents to improve its security maturity and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is properly configured and enforced across the entire website.
  4. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  5. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadace LANDEK Ostrava
Description
Nadace LANDEK Ostrava is a non-profit foundation focused on the preservation and promotion of mining heritage, cultural monuments, and traditions primarily in the Ostrava-Karviná region and Moravian-Silesian region. It supports projects related to the rescue and maintenance of mining and cultural sites, educates the public and youth about mining history, and promotes cultural activities in the region.
Key services
Grant funding for cultural and mining heritage projects, Promotion of mining traditions and industrial tourism, Publication and dissemination of reports and cultural materials
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a non-profit foundation site focused on mining heritage and cultural preservation.
  2. Content is primarily in Czech language.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links explicitly provided.
  5. No forms detected on the main page content.
  6. Minimal external linking, only one external domain (polar.cz) linked for media coverage.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Basic technical implementation with static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.
  9. No advanced CMS or frameworks detected.
  10. No security headers or explicit security policies found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack with static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript files. It is hosted on Forpsi servers, a Czech hosting provider. There is no evidence of a CMS or modern web frameworks. The site lacks meta tags for SEO beyond basic title and charset. Performance is likely moderate given the simple structure but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal technical complexity and low data collection. The site would benefit from modernization including responsive design, SEO enhancements, and security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nadace-landek.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nadace-landek.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.