Skip to main content

Security report for nabogo.com

NaboGO · Transportation · Denmark

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NaboGO operates the Nabogo platform, facilitating local carpooling primarily in Denmark and three other countries. The company partners with provinces and public transport authorities to promote sustainable shared transportation solutions. Their business model centers on enabling daily shared rides for commuting, schooling, and leisure, leveraging a mobile app and local partnerships. The website reflects a medium-sized, professional organization with a clear focus on transportation and mobility services. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO, supported by Cloudflare for CDN and security. The site is mobile-optimized and includes modern tracking and marketing tools with GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is good with HTTPS and Cloudflare protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security policy or vulnerability disclosure is present. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, though it could improve transparency around security policies and incident response.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nabogo.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NaboGO holds contracts with public transport authorities, positioning itself as a niche player in the shared mobility sector. Its competitive advantage lies in local partnerships and a user-friendly app facilitating carpooling. The company targets commuters, students, and leisure travelers seeking sustainable transport options. Revenue likely derives from partnerships and possibly app-related services. The website's multilingual support and presence in four countries indicate growth ambitions. The company maintains active social media channels and uses advanced marketing and analytics tools, reflecting a mature digital marketing strategy. However, absence of detailed business registration or physical contact info on the site suggests a focus on digital engagement rather than traditional corporate transparency.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare CDN, providing robust baseline security. Cookie consent is comprehensive and GDPR compliant, with detailed cookie categorization and third-party data processor disclosures. Use of Google reCAPTCHA enhances bot protection. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure page is found, limiting transparency on incident response and security governance. Security headers beyond HTTPS are not explicitly detected, suggesting room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be strengthened by implementing DNSSEC, publishing security policies, and enhancing HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information, including security or abuse email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NaboGO
Description
Nabogo enters into contracts with ambitious provinces and public transport authorities. Through local partnerships, we move behavior in the real world.
Key services
Carpooling app, Local partnerships with provinces and transport authorities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Cloudflare, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Formbricks
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare CDN and security services
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed cookie info
  • Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Formbricks
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO for content management and SEO.
  2. Cookie consent banner is comprehensive and GDPR compliant.
  3. Multiple social media channels linked and active.
  4. No explicit privacy policy page URL found but detailed cookie policy and privacy info present in consent banner.
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  6. HTTPS enforced with Cloudflare CDN and security services.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  8. No visible contact phone numbers or physical addresses on main page; contact primarily via form and social media.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Good use of tracking and marketing tools with user consent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. Hosting and DNS are managed via One.com and Cloudflare, providing CDN and security services. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles. Performance is moderate, with some minified CSS and JS assets. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Cookie Information overlay, ensuring GDPR compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, though enabling DNSSEC and enhancing security headers would improve the security posture further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nabogo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nabogo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.