Skip to main content

Security report for myskin.lv

Myskin · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Myskin.lv is a Latvian e-commerce retailer specializing in skincare and beauty products, serving as the official distributor for several top French cosmetic brands. The website targets Latvian consumers interested in high-quality skincare solutions and operates primarily through an online sales model. The company appears to be a small-sized business founded around 2017, with a consistent brand presence and a focus on customer trust through verified reviews and compliance with privacy regulations. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, integrating modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, TikTok Pixel, and Omnisend. Security measures include HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, the site demonstrates a good level of digital maturity and professionalism, with no signs of blocking or malicious activity. However, WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, so domain registration details remain unverified.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching myskin.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business holds a strong market position as an official distributor of multiple French skincare brands in Latvia, leveraging e-commerce to reach its target audience. Its business model focuses on retail sales of cosmetics and supplements, supported by a well-structured website with clear product categorization and brand segmentation. The integration of customer review systems and marketing pixels indicates an active approach to customer engagement and digital marketing. The company likely generates revenue through direct product sales and possibly through partnerships with payment and marketing service providers. Growth indicators include the use of advanced marketing tools and a comprehensive product catalog. The partnership with MakeCommerce for payment processing is a critical component of its operational ecosystem.

Security posture

The website maintains a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. Cookie consent and privacy policies align with GDPR requirements, indicating compliance awareness. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options were not detected, suggesting room for improvement in hardening the site against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the analyzed content. The absence of a public security policy or incident response contact points to a potential gap in transparency and preparedness. Regular updates and security audits are recommended to maintain and enhance security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen defense against web attacks.
  2. Establish and publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to proactively identify and mitigate risks.
  4. Ensure all forms have robust input validation and sanitization to prevent injection attacks.
  5. Maintain up-to-date software and plugins to reduce exposure to known vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Myskin
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Myskin
Description
Oficiālais sešu Francijas Top kosmētikas zīmolu izplatītājs Latvijā- Bioderma, Algotherm, Institut Esthederm, BeauTerra, Laino un Isispharma
Key services
Online sales of skincare products, Official distribution of French cosmetic brands
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, Judge.me, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, TikTok Pixel, Omnisend, MakeCommerce payment gateway, Recaptcha
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • Use of Judge.me for verified reviews

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, TikTok Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, TikTok Ads
Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel (via PixelYourSite)
Marketing tools
Omnisend, PixelYourSite
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian e-commerce platform specializing in skincare products.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with localized SEO and metadata.
  3. Uses multiple modern marketing and analytics tools.
  4. Has cookie consent and privacy policy compliant with GDPR.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF challenge detected.
  7. No explicit or adult content present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature and widely used CMS platform (WordPress) with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and Elementor for page building. It integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, marketing, and payment processing, indicating a modern and modular technical infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices in place. The presence of multiple scripts and external resources suggests a complex but well-managed front-end environment. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security headers. Hosting provider details were not discernible from the provided data. Overall, the technical stack supports the business needs effectively but requires ongoing maintenance to mitigate technical debt and security risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with myskin.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review myskin.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.