Skip to main content

Security report for myq-solution.com

MyQ, spol. s r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MyQ, spol. s r.o. is a Czech-based technology company specializing in print management solutions that enhance security, productivity, and efficiency in both traditional and digital workplaces. Their product suite includes on-premise and cloud-based offerings, supporting a wide range of printer brands and providing features such as secure printing, mobile and remote printing, and eco-friendly printing options. The company holds recognized certifications like ISO 27001 and TUV, reinforcing their commitment to security and quality. Technically, the website is hosted on Cloudflare and utilizes modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery. It integrates tracking and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity, with privacy controls in place. However, the site lacks a valid SSL/TLS certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support, which is a significant security concern. The security posture is currently weak due to the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols, no HSTS, and missing security headers. Despite this, the site implements good privacy compliance mechanisms, including a comprehensive cookie consent banner and a detailed privacy policy aligned with GDPR requirements. Overall, while the business and content aspects of the website are strong and professional, the lack of HTTPS significantly impacts the security score and poses risks to users. Strategic improvements in SSL implementation and security headers are critical to enhance trust and protect user data.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of myq-solution.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching myq-solution.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MyQ positions itself as a leading provider of print management solutions with a global reach, serving diverse industries through a multivendor approach. Their business model focuses on delivering both on-premise and cloud-based software products, catering to modern hybrid and remote work environments. The company leverages partnerships and maintains a strong ecosystem, including dedicated subdomains for specialized products like MyQ Roger. Their content strategy includes detailed product information, customer testimonials, and industry certifications, which support their market credibility and growth. The company targets medium to large enterprises seeking secure, efficient, and sustainable print management solutions.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of the website is low due to the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols, which exposes users to potential data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. No HSTS policy or strong cipher suites are configured, and OCSP stapling is not enabled. While the site uses HttpOnly cookies and has some security headers, critical best practices are missing. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. The lack of SSL is a critical vulnerability that must be addressed immediately to protect user data and maintain trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Support and enforce modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and strong cipher suites.
  4. Add comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom or proprietary CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery 3.4.1 and various UI/animation libraries. It is hosted behind Cloudflare, providing CDN and some security features. Performance metrics indicate slow loading, possibly due to lack of optimization or missing caching headers. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the absence of HTTPS and modern security protocols is a significant technical risk. The site integrates multiple third-party tracking and marketing tools with user consent mechanisms, reflecting a mature digital marketing approach.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with myq-solution.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review myq-solution.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.