Skip to main content

Security report for mykotroph.de

Linkila Technologies Inc. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Linkila Technologies Inc. operates a technology platform specializing in deep linking and bio link management solutions, targeting digital marketers and businesses seeking enhanced link marketing capabilities. The company appears to be a small-sized SaaS provider founded in 2020, with a consistent domain registration and a focused business model. The website content analyzed is a 404 error page, but the overall site structure includes key business pages such as privacy policy, terms, pricing, and help center, indicating a professional approach to user engagement. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Cloudflare DNS, Google Fonts, Trustpilot widgets, Google Analytics, and Ackee analytics. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare, ensuring good SSL configuration and moderate performance. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility and SEO are basic. The absence of DNSSEC and some security headers represents minor security gaps. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses domain status locks to prevent unauthorized transfers. However, no explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no cookie consent mechanism is present, which impacts privacy compliance. The site does not exhibit any vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns, and no adult or questionable content is detected, making it safe for general audiences. Overall, the website scores moderately well in business credibility and security posture but is limited by minimal content on the analyzed page and some privacy compliance gaps. Strategic improvements in security headers, cookie consent, and incident response transparency would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mykotroph.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Linkila Technologies Inc. occupies a niche in the technology sector focused on link management and marketing tools, particularly deep linking for bio links. Their SaaS business model targets digital marketers, social media users, and businesses needing efficient link solutions. The company demonstrates consistent branding and trust signals such as Trustpilot integration and a system status page. The domain age aligns with the company's founding year, supporting legitimacy. The absence of phone numbers and physical addresses on the analyzed page suggests a primarily digital-first operation. The company’s market position is that of a specialized technology provider with growth potential in digital marketing tools.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer locks are in place, reducing risk of domain hijacking. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no advanced security headers are detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. The lack of published security policies and incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Privacy compliance is partial due to missing cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site demonstrates basic security hygiene but would benefit from enhanced security controls and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies with dedicated contact channels for vulnerability reporting.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
  5. Enhance website content beyond error pages to improve content quality and user engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Linkila Technologies Inc.
Description
Linkila Technologies Inc. provides a platform focused on deep linking and bio link solutions, targeting users who want to optimize link management and marketing.
Key services
DeepLink for Bio Links, Link management, Marketing tools
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare DNS, Google Fonts, Trustpilot widget, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Ackee analytics, JavaScript ES6+, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Ackee
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Ackee
Marketing tools
Trustpilot widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a 404 error page indicating the requested page is not found.
  2. Main navigation and footer provide links to key pages including privacy, terms, pricing, blog, and help center.
  3. No forms detected on the 404 page.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found.
  6. Use of modern web fonts and external analytics scripts.
  7. No phone numbers or physical addresses found on the analyzed page.
  8. Contact email support@linkila.com found in footer.
  9. Social media presence on Twitter with handle @LinkilaApp.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, Google Fonts for typography, and integrates third-party analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Ackee. The presence of Trustpilot widgets indicates marketing and reputation management efforts. The site is mobile optimized and loads with moderate performance. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates areas for technical improvement. The site’s 404 page is minimal, which impacts content richness but navigation and footer links maintain usability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mykotroph.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mykotroph.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.