Skip to main content

Security report for mygp.sk

Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website mygp.sk serves as a login portal for a marketplace platform, leveraging the Keycloak authentication framework and PatternFly CSS for UI styling. It supports multiple languages, indicating a regional focus primarily in Slovakia and neighboring countries. The domain is professionally registered and hosted on AWS infrastructure, suggesting a stable technical foundation. However, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. The login form is basic with standard security practices such as password masking and autocomplete disabled, but lacks advanced security headers and anti-CSRF protections. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks but shows room for improvement in SEO, accessibility, and mobile optimization. No advertising or tracking technologies were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The absence of contact information and security policies reduces transparency and trustworthiness. The WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistent registration details, supporting the business credibility. Security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing security headers, anti-CSRF tokens, and multi-factor authentication. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is functional but basic, with opportunities to improve security, privacy, and user trust. Strategic recommendations include adding comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, implementing multi-factor authentication, and providing clear contact and incident response information to improve compliance and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mygp.sk

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mygp.sk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
12
Employees
0
Customers
12
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for mygp.sk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates a marketplace platform requiring user authentication, targeting users primarily in Slovakia and surrounding regions. The company was founded in 2019 and maintains a small-sized operation. The use of AWS hosting and Keycloak indicates a focus on scalable and secure authentication services. The multilingual support suggests an intent to serve a diverse user base. The lack of visible marketing or advertising tools implies a focus on core service delivery rather than aggressive user acquisition. The absence of detailed business information or trust signals limits deeper competitive analysis. The company appears to maintain a lean digital footprint focused on secure access to its marketplace services.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and standard secure input types for login forms, but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. No anti-CSRF tokens were detected, which could expose the site to cross-site request forgery attacks. The absence of visible incident response contacts or security policies indicates limited transparency in security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the provided content, but the lack of advanced security controls suggests potential risk areas. Compliance with GDPR and other regulations is not clearly demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Incorporate anti-CSRF tokens in all forms to prevent cross-site request forgery.
  4. Enable multi-factor authentication to strengthen user account security.
  5. Provide visible contact information and incident response procedures to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to be a login portal for mygp-sk, likely related to a marketplace or service platform. It supports multiple languages including English, German, Czech, Slovak, and Romanian. The business model appears to be a user authentication gateway for a marketplace UI client.
Key services
User authentication, Marketplace access
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS (PatternFly), Keycloak (authentication framework)
Frameworks
PatternFly, Keycloak
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL scheme)
  • Secure login form with password input type
  • Autocomplete off on sensitive fields

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for a marketplace platform.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the login page.
  3. No contact information or security policies visible.
  4. Uses Keycloak authentication framework and PatternFly CSS.
  5. Hosted on AWS infrastructure.
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No social media or external marketing links present.
  8. Basic multilingual support available.
  9. No visible security headers or advanced security features on login form.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard HTML5 and CSS with the PatternFly framework for UI components, integrated with Keycloak for authentication management. Hosting is provided via AWS, as indicated by the DNS nameservers. The site is multilingual but shows basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal, with no Open Graph or structured data present. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach or minimal marketing focus. The login form disables autocomplete on sensitive fields and uses standard input types. However, the absence of security headers and anti-CSRF tokens represents technical debt and potential security risks. Performance is likely moderate given the use of AWS and lightweight frontend frameworks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mygp.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mygp.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.