Skip to main content

Security report for myapps.hu

myapps.hu · Transportation · Hungary

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

myApps.hu is a specialized company focused on developing Android and iOS mobile applications tailored for the tourism sector. Their offerings include digital tour guides, audio guides, map-based navigation, and personalized tour guiding solutions. The company targets museums, exhibitions, and tourist destinations, providing interactive and engaging experiences for visitors. The website is professionally designed with multilingual support and integrates modern technologies such as WordPress CMS, Google Analytics, and reCAPTCHA for security and analytics purposes. However, the site lacks visible privacy policies, terms of service, and direct contact information, which are important for trust and compliance. The security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, but could be improved by adding explicit security headers and publishing security policies. Overall, the website presents a credible and professional business with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching myapps.hu

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
48
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche provider of tourism-related mobile applications, leveraging a custom-built tourism database and unique interactive solutions. Their business model revolves around custom app development for tourism destinations, supported by partnerships with official tourism sites such as visitesztergom-budapest.hu. The target customers include museums, exhibitions, and tourists seeking enhanced digital experiences. The website content and linked apps indicate a focus on quality and innovation in the tourism technology space. The company appears to be small-sized, operating primarily in Hungary, with a clear branding and consistent messaging. The use of structured data and SEO plugins suggests an intent to maintain good online visibility and user engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a missed opportunity to harden the security posture. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. The use of reputable WordPress plugins and analytics tools indicates a moderate security maturity level. Recommendations include implementing additional security headers, publishing a security policy, and providing clear contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Add explicit HTTP security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
myapps.hu
Description
Android and iOS mobile application development, tourism application, audio guide, digital tour guide
Key services
Android and iOS mobile application development, Tourism applications, Audio guides, Digital tour guides, Map-based navigation, Personalized tour guiding
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, PHP, Google Analytics (MonsterInsights plugin), Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, Font Awesome, Typicons, Google Fonts, All in One SEO plugin, Site Kit by Google
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, td-composer (Newspaper theme), MonsterInsights Analytics
Platforms
Web, Android, iOS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA used
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress plugins)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights Google Analytics plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear focus on tourism app development
  2. Content is well structured with multilingual support (English, Hungarian, Spanish)
  3. Use of modern WordPress theme and plugins
  4. Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA integrated
  5. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page
  6. Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  7. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main page
  8. No visible security or incident response policies
  9. Official apps linked for Android and iOS platforms
  10. External links mainly to trusted domains and partner tourism sites
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 using the Newspaper theme and several plugins including All in One SEO, MonsterInsights for Google Analytics, and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. The tech stack includes jQuery, Font Awesome, Typicons, and Google Fonts. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of caching plugins implied. The site uses multilingual support with hreflang tags for English, Hungarian, and Spanish. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with myapps.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review myapps.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.