Skip to main content

Security report for musikfonds.de

MUSIKFONDS E.V. · Non-profit · Germany

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Musikfonds e.V. is a German non-profit organization dedicated to supporting contemporary music projects through funding programs, events, and networking. The website reflects a well-established cultural institution with governmental backing, targeting musicians, composers, and cultural organizations within Germany. The business model focuses on grant-making and fostering the contemporary music scene. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 10, leveraging modern libraries such as jQuery and UIkit, with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though improvements could be made by adding security headers and a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and content-rich, with clear contact information and social media presence. No adult or questionable content is present, making it safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching musikfonds.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Musikfonds operates as an important non-profit entity in the cultural sector of Germany, with a focus on contemporary music funding. It benefits from governmental support, as evidenced by logos and funding announcements. The organization engages its target audience through multiple funding rounds, workshops, and events, maintaining a strong presence in the German cultural ecosystem. The website's external links to official government and cultural bodies reinforce its credibility. The business model is grant-based, with a focus on supporting artists and projects rather than commercial revenue streams. The organization appears small in size but well-positioned within its niche. The lack of explicit business registration details on the site is typical for non-profits but does not detract from its legitimacy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be exploited in certain attack scenarios. No vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file is present, which limits transparency for security researchers. The site uses modern frameworks and libraries without visible outdated or vulnerable components. Forms are present but no explicit anti-CSRF or input validation details are visible in the HTML. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced with standard security headers and formal vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve defense-in-depth.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR cookie regulations.
  3. Publish a security policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Review and document data retention policies and privacy compliance measures explicitly on the site.
  5. Consider adding contact emails and phone numbers explicitly labeled for business and security contacts to improve transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MUSIKFONDS E.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MUSIKFONDS E.V.
Description
Musikfonds e.V. is a non-profit organization supporting contemporary music projects in Germany through funding programs, events, and networking opportunities.
Key services
Project funding, Stipends, Workshops and events, Networking for contemporary music scene
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, jQuery, UIkit
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
sibforms.com (newsletter signup)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and maintained using Drupal 10.
  2. Content is rich with cultural project announcements and funding information.
  3. Clear governmental affiliation and funding support indicated.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner detected, which could be improved.
  6. Social media presence on Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube is linked.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and widely used CMS, ensuring a robust content management framework. It uses jQuery and UIkit for UI components and responsiveness, providing good mobile optimization and accessibility. The hosting provider is identified via nameservers as rzone.de, a German hosting provider. Performance is moderate with no obvious blocking scripts or heavy third-party trackers. SEO is supported by canonical and shortlink meta tags. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking scripts, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. There is room for improvement in security headers and cookie consent implementation. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid and appropriate for a non-profit cultural organization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with musikfonds.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review musikfonds.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.