Münsterland e.V. · Non-profit · Germany
Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.
Münsterland e.V. operates as a regional development and promotional organization focused on enhancing the quality of life, economic opportunities, cultural engagement, and tourism in the Münsterland region of Germany. The website serves as a comprehensive portal for residents, businesses, tourists, and cultural participants, offering detailed information about living, working, and visiting the region. The organization positions itself as a key regional player fostering community, innovation, and sustainable growth. Technically, the website is built on a ProcessWire CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Bing UET for analytics and marketing. Accessibility features are well implemented, including WCAG options and cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, with structured data enhancing search engine visibility. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent for privacy compliance. However, it lacks explicit security headers and a published security.txt file, which are recommended for improved security posture. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, though the website content and branding appear professional and trustworthy. Overall, the site presents a low-risk profile with strong content quality and technical implementation but would benefit from enhanced transparency in domain registration and security incident response information.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.
Domain expires in 19 days
What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention muensterland.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for muensterland.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with muensterland.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review muensterland.com.