Skip to main content

Security report for mrgreen.works

Green.DNA · Real Estate · Netherlands

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Green.DNA operates the Mr.Green boutique office collection, providing innovative office and meeting spaces combined with hospitality services in the Netherlands. The company targets professionals seeking flexible, stylish, and inspiring work environments that blend work, meeting, and dining experiences. The website reflects a medium-sized business with a niche market position emphasizing lifestyle and experience in real estate and hospitality sectors. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and integrates modern JavaScript libraries and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight. While the site is well-designed and mobile-optimized, it lacks some advanced security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are areas for improvement. The security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but missing some best practices. Overall, the domain registration is privacy protected but consistent with a legitimate business. The site provides clear contact information and trust signals such as membership in the Dutch Venue Association.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mrgreen.works

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
55
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a boutique provider of office and meeting spaces with integrated food and networking services, targeting professionals and businesses valuing ambiance and flexibility. Its business model combines real estate leasing with hospitality offerings, creating a unique value proposition. The presence of a partner domain (mrgreenoffices.nl) indicates a broader ecosystem. The website content and structure support lead generation through contact forms and phone calls. The company maintains active social media channels to engage its audience. The lack of explicit data on founding year or parent company limits deeper business intelligence but the medium size and sector focus are clear.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable third-party analytics and marketing tools. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is published, and no security.txt file is found. The absence of a cookie consent banner despite tracking scripts may pose GDPR compliance risks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, privacy notices, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and inform users about tracking.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Review and minimize third-party scripts to reduce attack surface and improve performance.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Green.DNA
Description
Mr.Green offers boutique office locations combining working, meeting, and dining in inspiring and stylish environments. It targets professionals seeking flexible, classy, and vibrant workspaces with amenities.
Key services
Office locations, Meeting rooms, Event and networking spaces, Food and beverage services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Photoswipe, Slick Carousel, PrettyPhoto Lightbox, Swiper, UI Morphing Button, WordPress
Frameworks
Divi Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW- IDs detected)
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Qooqie API
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear branding and consistent style.
  2. Content is in Dutch and targets local Dutch market.
  3. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of tracking scripts.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone and email.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts.
  7. No visible security headers in provided data; potential area for improvement.
  8. Membership in Dutch Venue Association adds trust.
  9. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with the Divi theme, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Swiper, and Photoswipe for UI enhancements. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for marketing and analytics. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and icons from Font Awesome CDN. Performance is moderate with some optimization such as preloading fonts and async script loading. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies detected. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional website but can benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mrgreen.works. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mrgreen.works.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.