Skip to main content

Security report for moventia.net

Moventia · Transportation · Spain

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Moventia is a well-established multinational family business specializing in sustainable mobility solutions since 1923. The company offers integrated services in collective and private mobility, emphasizing quality, innovation, and sustainability. Their digital presence is built on a modern WordPress platform with multilingual support and SEO optimization, reflecting a mature and professional online identity. However, the website suffers from a critical security flaw due to an invalid SSL certificate, resulting in the absence of HTTPS protection, which poses risks to user data and trust. While privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, no explicit security or incident response policies are found. The domain registration is consistent and mature, supporting the company's legitimacy. Strategic improvements in SSL deployment and security headers are recommended to enhance the security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching moventia.net

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
20
Email security
50
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Moventia holds a strong market position in the transportation sector in Spain, with a large workforce and international expansion. Their business model focuses on providing comprehensive mobility services combining public and private transport modes. The company actively engages in social responsibility, innovation, and employee development, as evidenced by their news updates and corporate content. Their digital ecosystem includes dedicated portals for employees and ethical reporting, indicating a structured organizational approach. The presence of social media channels and marketing tools like Google Tag Manager supports their outreach and analytics capabilities. The company’s mature domain and consistent WHOIS data reinforce their credibility in the market.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate but impaired by the lack of a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical vulnerability. The absence of HTTPS undermines data confidentiality and integrity for users accessing the site. Other security best practices such as HSTS, DNSSEC, and OCSP stapling are not implemented, limiting protection against advanced threats. No security policy or incident response information is publicly available, which may impact transparency and readiness. The site does not expose known vulnerable libraries or subdomain takeover risks, which is positive. Overall, the security maturity is basic and requires urgent improvements in SSL deployment and security headers to meet industry standards and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload options.
  3. Implement DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  5. Add comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  6. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  7. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  8. Enhance contact information visibility including verified company emails and phone numbers for support and security contacts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins, indicating a modern and flexible CMS environment. It uses Slider Revolution for rich media content and WPML for multilingual support. The hosting environment is Plesk on Linux, with nginx as the web server. Performance metrics are not available, but the site includes many scripts and stylesheets which may impact load times. Accessibility features are implemented via EqualWeb integration. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and structured JSON-LD data. However, the invalid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS are significant technical risks. The site is mobile optimized and has good navigation clarity. Technical debt appears low but security technical debt is high due to missing SSL and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with moventia.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review moventia.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.