Skip to main content

Security report for moventia.es

Moventia · Transportation · Spain

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Moventia is a well-established Spanish multinational company specializing in collective and private mobility solutions since 1923. The company positions itself as a leader in the transportation sector with a strong emphasis on innovation, sustainability, and quality service. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with multilingual support, rich multimedia content, and comprehensive corporate information. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, though performance is somewhat slow likely due to heavy resource usage. Security posture is a concern due to an invalid SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS protocols, which exposes the site to risks and undermines user trust. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the business credibility is high, supported by consistent branding and trust signals, but security improvements are critical to maintain reputation and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching moventia.es

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
40
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Moventia operates primarily in the transportation sector, offering both collective and private mobility services through subsidiaries Moventis and Movento. The company targets users, clients, and partners interested in sustainable and innovative mobility solutions. Their business model includes service provision, international expansion, and corporate social responsibility initiatives. The website indicates active engagement with stakeholders via news updates, social media, and ethical reporting channels. The company leverages digital marketing tools and analytics to optimize user engagement. The domain registration and WHOIS data align well with the company's history and legitimacy, reinforcing trustworthiness.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of Moventia's website is basic with significant gaps. The absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols are critical vulnerabilities that expose users to potential data interception and trust issues. The lack of security headers and session management features further weakens the security posture. No explicit incident response or security policies are published, indicating limited transparency in security governance. While no active vulnerabilities like heartbleed or poodle are detected, the foundational SSL/TLS issues must be addressed urgently. Compliance with GDPR is supported by privacy and cookie policies, but incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user connections.
  2. Enable and configure modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) to enhance encryption strength.
  3. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  5. Regularly audit and update all third-party plugins and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  6. Enhance performance optimization to reduce page load times and improve user experience.
  7. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations and practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor and Slider Revolution plugins, integrating multimedia content including Vimeo videos. It uses Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management. The site is multilingual with language switchers and SEO optimized via Yoast SEO. Performance is slow with a high number of resources and large page size, indicating potential for optimization. Accessibility features are implemented via EqualWeb scripts. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site lacks DNSSEC and CAA records, which could improve DNS security. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with moventia.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review moventia.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.