Skip to main content

Security report for mountfield.cz

Mountfield · Retail · Czech Republic

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mountfield.cz is a leading Czech retailer specializing in garden technology, furniture, and pools, operating both online and through over 50 physical stores. The website is professionally designed with a clear focus on consumer garden products and services, offering a comprehensive shopping experience including customer support and after-sales services. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, ensuring good performance and user experience across devices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be explicitly verified or enhanced. The absence of WHOIS data is likely due to privacy protection, which is justified for a large retail business. Overall, the website is trustworthy, compliant with GDPR, and free from adult or questionable content, making it suitable for a general audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mountfield.cz

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mountfield holds a strong market position as a specialist garden retailer in the Czech Republic, targeting consumers interested in garden maintenance, outdoor living, and wellness products. The business model combines e-commerce with physical retail stores, supported by a robust digital presence. Revenue streams likely include product sales, service offerings, and possibly extended warranties or maintenance contracts. The company uses a broad partnership ecosystem including major ad networks and analytics providers to optimize marketing and customer insights. Strategic observations indicate a mature operation with focus on customer experience and compliance, though opportunities exist to enhance security transparency and incident response readiness.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and a comprehensive cookie consent framework supporting GDPR compliance. Integration of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts is managed with user consent, reducing privacy risks. However, explicit presence of some security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options was not confirmed in the HTML content and should be verified. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, representing a gap in transparency. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved with formalized disclosure and enhanced header policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts to mitigate supply chain risks.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider implementing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mountfield
Description
Mountfield is a specialist retailer focused on garden technology, garden furniture, and pools with over 50 stores in the Czech Republic and free shipping on orders over 1999 CZK.
Key services
Garden machinery sales, Garden furniture sales, Pools and wellness products, Customer service and advice, After-sales service and spare parts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Cookiebot, Convert Experiments, SmartForm, Daktela chat
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular control
  • Service worker registration with error handling
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Smartlook, Convert Experiments
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform, RTB House, Appnexus, Google DoubleClick, Teads, UnderdogMedia
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Hotjar, Smartlook, Convert Experiments
Marketing tools
Persoo, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform specializing in garden products and services.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy in Czech language.
  3. Multiple external trusted analytics and marketing services integrated.
  4. No WHOIS data available, likely due to privacy protection or registry restrictions.
  5. No signs of WAF blocking or security challenges.
  6. No exposed sensitive information or security vulnerabilities detected in HTML content.
  7. Good mobile optimization and user experience.
  8. No explicit or adult content present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Cookiebot for consent management, and various marketing and analytics tools. The platform appears to be built on Shopsys Framework or a similar e-commerce framework, supporting a structured category and product navigation. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses service workers for offline capabilities and progressive web app features. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security management. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and explicitly document security headers and policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mountfield.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mountfield.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.