Skip to main content

Security report for monger.eu

OÜ Monger Baltic · Retail · Estonia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Monger Baltic OÜ is a small Estonian retail and distribution company founded in 2009, specializing in health and sports lifestyle brands across the Baltic region. The company operates an e-commerce website offering a range of innovative and quality products from partner brands such as KT Tape, Sportique, Zensah, and Cool’n Tape. Their business model focuses on online sales combined with brand representation and customer delivery services, targeting consumers interested in health and sports products. The website supports multiple languages, enhancing accessibility for regional customers. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with integration of Google Tag Manager and Plausible Analytics for tracking. Payment options include Paysera, Paypal, credit cards, and bank transfers, indicating a mature e-commerce setup. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices, though some accessibility features could be improved. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration but lacks visible security headers and a cookie consent mechanism. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, but incident response and security policies are not published. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced with additional headers and formal policies. The overall risk assessment is low, with a trustworthy domain registration consistent with the business claims. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, adding cookie consent, publishing security policies, and maintaining regular security audits to enhance compliance and trust. The website presents a professional and credible online presence suitable for its business scope.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching monger.eu

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Monger Baltic holds a stable position as a regional distributor and e-commerce retailer for health and sports lifestyle brands in the Baltic states. Their competitive advantage lies in representing well-known niche brands and providing convenient online ordering with multiple payment options. The business model leverages direct-to-consumer sales and brand partnerships, generating revenue through product sales and distribution. Target customers are health-conscious and sports-oriented individuals in Estonia and neighboring countries. Growth potential exists through expanding brand portfolio and enhancing digital marketing. The partnership ecosystem includes recognized brands and payment service providers, supporting operational efficiency and customer trust. The company maintains clear contact and return policies, reinforcing customer confidence and operational transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which limits transparency and readiness for security events. Privacy practices are strong with a detailed GDPR-compliant privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, potentially impacting compliance. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Plausible Analytics is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small e-commerce business but can be improved by adopting additional security best practices and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to ensure full compliance with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
OÜ Monger Baltic
VAT number
EE101515355
Registration number
11813309
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OÜ Monger Baltic
Description
Monger Baltic is a trading company founded in 2009 that represents health and sports lifestyle brands in the Baltic region and nearby areas. They focus on innovative and quality products and prioritize customer satisfaction.
Key services
Online product ordering, Brand representation, Customer delivery services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics, Paysera payment system, Paypal, WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in Estonian with multilingual support for English, Finnish, Latvian, Lithuanian, and Russian.
  3. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found.
  4. No visible security headers in HTML source.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with standard plugins for multilingual support.
  6. Payment methods include Paysera, Paypal, credit cards, and bank transfers.
  7. Clear and detailed privacy policy and return policy provided.
  8. Contact information is complete and consistent.
  9. No social media links detected in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager and Plausible Analytics for tracking. It supports multiple languages via WPML plugin, enhancing regional accessibility. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and the design is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved for compliance with standards such as WCAG. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider details were identified from the HTML content. The site lacks some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, representing technical debt in security compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small e-commerce business but has room for modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with monger.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review monger.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.