Skip to main content

Security report for moller.no

Møller Mobility Group · Transportation · Norway

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Møller Mobility Group is a leading automotive group in the Nordic and Baltic regions, founded in 1936 and still family-owned. The company specializes in import, sales, service, and financing of major automotive brands including Volkswagen, Audi, Škoda, and CUPRA. Their market position is strong as the largest car dealership chain in Norway and a significant player in the region. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as Adobe DTM for analytics and OneTrust for cookie consent, indicating a commitment to privacy and compliance. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear corporate information and social media integration. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some advanced security headers and policies could be improved. Overall, the website and business demonstrate high professionalism and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching moller.no

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates primarily in the transportation sector with a business model focused on automotive import, retail, and associated financial and mobility services. Their subsidiaries cover a broad range of services from financing to mobility solutions, indicating a diversified revenue stream. The target audience includes customers in the Nordic and Baltic automotive markets, as well as potential employees. The company leverages partnerships and subsidiaries to expand its service offerings. The website content and structure support a strong brand presence and customer engagement. Growth indicators include a focus on electric vehicles and sustainability, as noted in their content. The partnership ecosystem is robust with multiple related domains and services.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting compliance with GDPR and privacy best practices. However, no explicit security policy or incident response contact information is publicly available, which could be a gap in transparency. The use of Adobe DTM and OneTrust indicates mature analytics and privacy management. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Security headers appear to be missing or not detected, which is a recommended improvement. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file suggests limited public security engagement. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance form security and validation if any data collection forms are introduced in the future.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Møller Mobility Group
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Møller Mobility Group
Description
Møller Mobility Group er det ledende bilkonsernet i Norden og Baltikum. Selskapet ble grunnlagt av Harald Aars Møller i 1936, og Volkswagen-importørkontrakten ble undertegnet i 1948. Konsernet eies fortsatt av familien og fjerde generasjons eier, Øyvind Schage Førde, er styreleder.
Key services
Import, Salg, Service, Finansiering
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe DTM (Adobe Dynamic Tag Management), OneTrust Cookie Consent, Imgix (image CDN), Polyfill.io, JavaScript ES6, SVG graphics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics (via Adobe DTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe DTM, OneTrust
Marketing tools
Adobe DTM, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong corporate branding and consistent messaging.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy in place.
  4. No visible forms collecting personal data on the homepage.
  5. Social media presence is well integrated and consistent.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and CDNs for performance.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Adobe DTM for tag management and analytics, OneTrust for cookie consent, and Imgix for image delivery, indicating a focus on performance and compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and responsive images. The site uses SVG for logos and icons, enhancing scalability and visual quality. There is room for improvement in security headers and explicit technical documentation of security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with moller.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review moller.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.