Skip to main content

Security report for mojekolo.cz

Mojekolo.cz · Retail · Czech Republic

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mojekolo.cz is a leading Czech e-commerce and retail business specializing in bicycles, electric bikes, and cycling accessories. With 14 physical stores and a comprehensive online presence, it serves cycling enthusiasts and outdoor sports customers primarily in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The website offers a broad product catalog, customer service options, and informative content such as magazines and advice sections. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, and cookie consent frameworks, ensuring a good user experience and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data, though improvements could be made by adding security headers and publishing formal security policies. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable concern for domain legitimacy but does not detract from the professional business operation evident on the site. Overall, Mojekolo.cz presents a trustworthy and well-maintained platform for cycling retail.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mojekolo.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
54
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mojekolo.cz holds a strong market position as the largest cycling store in its region, combining physical retail with e-commerce. Its business model focuses on direct sales of bicycles, e-bikes, and related accessories, supported by service reservations and customer engagement through editorial content. The company targets active sports consumers and outdoor enthusiasts, leveraging multiple sales channels and promotions such as free shipping. The integration of Google Tag Manager indicates a data-driven marketing approach. Lack of visible certifications or security policies suggests room for maturity in compliance and trust-building. The missing WHOIS data is a potential risk factor but may be due to registry or privacy settings. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses standard security practices to protect user data. However, it lacks advanced security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, limiting transparency in security management. The site uses cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness and should be addressed. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with formal policies and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish and maintain accurate WHOIS domain registration data to improve trust and legitimacy.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Create and publish a security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and security researchers.
  4. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  5. Maintain transparency in data protection practices and update privacy and cookie policies as regulations evolve.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mojekolo.cz
Description
Největší cyklistický obchod ✓ Již 14 prodejen ✓ Jízdní kola, elektrokola, cyklo doplňky a komponenty ✓
Key services
Sales of bicycles, Sales of electric bicycles, Cycling accessories and components, Service reservations, Information and advice via magazine and poradna
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Vanilla Cookie Consent, Flexslider, FontAwesome
Frameworks
Bootstrap (navbar classes), Vanilla Cookie Consent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform for cycling and outdoor sports products.
  2. Content is rich with product listings, promotions, and useful customer information.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with email and phone.
  4. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and may affect trust.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Good privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are in place.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern front-end technologies including Bootstrap for responsive design, Flexslider for image carousels, and FontAwesome for icons. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. Cookie consent is managed via a vanilla JavaScript library, ensuring GDPR compliance. The site loads multiple JavaScript bundles and CSS files efficiently. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and clear navigation. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO optimizations, as well as improved security headers to reduce risk exposure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 49/100High29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mojekolo.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mojekolo.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.