Skip to main content

Security report for mogt.is

M&T ehf. · Transportation · Iceland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

M&T ehf. is a specialized Icelandic company founded in 1999, focusing on the design, installation, and maintenance of automated weather stations and related meteorological equipment. Their primary clients include government agencies and infrastructure operators such as the Icelandic Road and Coastal Administration and Landsnet. The website reflects a niche B2B service provider with a small company size and a clear focus on weather-related technology solutions within Iceland. The site is built on Joomla! CMS with MooTools JavaScript framework and includes Google Analytics for visitor tracking. However, it lacks modern privacy and security policy disclosures, and no cookie consent mechanism is present. The technical infrastructure is basic but functional, with moderate performance and limited mobile optimization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mogt.is

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company occupies a niche market segment providing essential infrastructure services related to weather monitoring in Iceland. Their business model is primarily B2B, serving government and maritime clients. The website content and domain registration data align well, supporting legitimacy and a stable market presence. The absence of privacy policies and limited contact information online may restrict broader customer engagement but is consistent with a specialized service provider. The external links to subdomains of vedur.mogt.is suggest an ecosystem of related weather information services, potentially operated or partnered with M&T ehf.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and standard security headers, which are important for enhancing domain and web security. No privacy or security policies are published, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. Google Analytics is used without visible cookie consent, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. No forms or input fields reduce the risk of injection vulnerabilities, but the overall security posture is basic and could be improved by implementing security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and trust.
  2. Implement standard HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  4. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency and incident response readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
M&T ehf.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
M&T ehf.
Description
M&T ehf. was founded in 1999 by Magnús Helga Steinarsson and Torfi Birkir Jóhannsson. The company specializes in the construction, installation, and maintenance of automated weather stations and related equipment. Their main clients include the Icelandic Road and Coastal Administration (Vegagerðin), Landsnet, and the country's harbors.
Key services
Design and construction of automated weather stations, Installation and maintenance of meteorological equipment, Weather information systems
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, MooTools, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Joomla!
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information limited to phone numbers and physical address in footer; no email addresses found.
  4. Website uses Joomla! CMS with MooTools JavaScript framework.
  5. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. No security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. Content is primarily in Icelandic language focused on weather station services.
  8. No forms detected on the main page; no data collection fields present.
  9. External links mostly point to subdomains of vedur.mogt.is and one IP address.
  10. No social media links or email addresses found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla! CMS with MooTools JavaScript framework, indicating a somewhat dated but stable technology stack. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking without explicit consent mechanisms. The site has moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. No broken elements or errors were detected in the HTML content. The absence of modern security headers and DNSSEC represents technical debt and security risk. The site structure and navigation are clear but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mogt.is. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mogt.is.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.