Skip to main content

Security report for modrazastava.si

Društvo DOVES - FEE SLOVENIA · Non-profit · Slovenia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Modra Zastava is a Slovenian non-profit environmental program focused on promoting eco-label certification for coastal locations to ensure environmental protection, water quality, and sustainable tourism. The program is well-established since 2005 and operates under the management of Društvo DOVES - FEE SLOVENIA. The website serves as an informational and promotional platform targeting tourists, municipalities, and environmental stakeholders. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The hosting is inferred to be with Hostmachine based on nameservers. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with good content quality and clear navigation. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and incident response information. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the website content, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching modrazastava.si

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector focusing on environmental sustainability and eco-labeling. Its market position is strong within Slovenia as a recognized eco-label program with international affiliations. The business model revolves around certification, education, and promotion of sustainable tourism. Key partnerships with environmental foundations and educational programs enhance its ecosystem. The website content and structure reflect a professional and consistent branding approach, targeting environmentally conscious tourists and local authorities. Growth potential lies in expanding awareness and adoption of the eco-label. Revenue streams are likely grant and donation-based, typical for non-profits.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The use of third-party analytics and marketing tools is transparent but requires ongoing monitoring for privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but should be enhanced to mitigate emerging threats.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Create and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to the latest versions to reduce vulnerability risks.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Consider adding more detailed privacy and data retention policies to strengthen GDPR compliance and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Društvo DOVES - FEE SLOVENIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Društvo DOVES - FEE SLOVENIA
Description
Program Modra zastava predstavlja resno in globoko zavezo tako za ljudi kot za okolje. Okoljski znak Modra zastava je pokazatelj (eko)kakovosti turistične destinacije in spodbuja okoljsko zavedanje s pomočjo izobraževalnih aktivnosti.
Key services
Eco-label certification, Environmental education, Promotion of sustainable tourism
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.4.18, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, SiteOrigin Panels, Google Analytics
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
ShareThis
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based non-profit environmental program site.
  2. Content is well-structured and professionally presented.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  4. No security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  5. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with official emails and phone.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Use of Google Analytics and ShareThis for tracking and marketing.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a stable WordPress platform using well-known plugins such as Yoast SEO and SiteOrigin Panels for layout management. The tech stack includes jQuery and Google Analytics for interactivity and analytics. Hosting is likely provided by Hostmachine, inferred from nameservers. The site demonstrates moderate performance with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Some technical debt is evident in the lack of security headers and limited accessibility features. The site uses a cookie consent plugin compliant with GDPR. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small non-profit but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with modrazastava.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review modrazastava.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.