Skip to main content

Security report for mobilityonline.eu

AutoDisk B.V. · Transportation · Netherlands

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website bijvoorbeeldlease under the domain www.mobilityonline.eu is an online platform focused on providing mobility leasing solutions primarily targeting Dutch-speaking business users. The platform is branded under AutoDisk B.V., which appears to be the parent company. The site offers a login mechanism based on email magic links, indicating a modern approach to user authentication. The business model revolves around facilitating mobility leasing arrangements digitally, positioning itself as a niche player in the Dutch transportation leasing market. Technically, the website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks such as Vue.js and Nuxt.js, leveraging popular libraries like FontAwesome and Material Design Icons for UI elements. Static assets are hosted on Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, and Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though SEO and accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses a passwordless login approach, which reduces password-related risks. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or HSTS were detected, and no privacy or cookie policies are present on the login page, indicating gaps in compliance and security best practices. The WHOIS data is fully redacted due to EURid privacy protection, which is common but reduces transparency. Overall, the website is functional and professionally presented but would benefit from enhanced security headers, clear privacy and cookie policies, and improved transparency to increase trust and compliance. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy documentation, and providing clear contact information for security incidents.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mobilityonline.eu

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the transportation sector, focusing on mobility leasing services through an online platform. Its competitive advantage lies in providing a streamlined digital experience for leasing arrangements, targeting Dutch businesses. The parent company AutoDisk B.V. supports the platform, indicating a small but focused operation. Revenue likely derives from leasing service fees or partnerships. The absence of extensive content or multiple subsidiaries suggests a lean business model. The partnership with autodisk.nl indicates a connected ecosystem. Growth potential depends on expanding service offerings and improving compliance and trust signals.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. The use of HTTPS and passwordless login are positive indicators. However, the absence of security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options weakens defense-in-depth. Lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency. The WHOIS privacy protection is standard but reduces trust. Overall, the site should enhance security controls, document policies, and provide incident contacts to improve maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies on the website to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add explicit contact information for security incidents and data protection officer if applicable.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate risks.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve user experience and reach.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AutoDisk B.V.
Description
Mobility Online platform providing online mobility leasing solutions under the brand Bijvoorbeeldlease.
Key services
Mobility leasing arrangements, Online login and user authentication, Mobility product selection and management
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Nuxt.js, Google Analytics, FontAwesome, Material Design Icons, Google Fonts (Roboto)
Frameworks
Vue.js, Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Login form uses email-based login link (passwordless)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and functional with no blocking detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the login page.
  3. Login form uses email-based magic link authentication, reducing password risks.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers found on the page.
  5. External resources loaded from reputable CDNs and Google services.
  6. No social media links or physical addresses found on the login page.
  7. Security headers are not visible in provided data; recommend adding.
  8. WHOIS data is fully redacted, limiting domain ownership transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack with Vue.js and Nuxt.js frameworks, enabling server-side rendering and good performance. Static assets are served from Azure Blob Storage, ensuring reliable hosting. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for analytics. The site is mobile responsive and uses popular icon fonts and Google Fonts for UI consistency. However, SEO optimization is minimal with no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. Accessibility features are basic, and no CMS is identified, suggesting a custom or framework-based build. Performance is moderate with preloading of scripts and stylesheets. Technical debt appears low but could improve with enhanced SEO and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mobilityonline.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mobilityonline.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.