Skip to main content

Security report for mobicoop.fr

Mobicoop · Transportation · France

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mobicoop.fr is a French-based free and commission-free carpooling platform established in 2017. The website offers a service aimed at facilitating daily and occasional ride sharing as a common good, targeting a general audience interested in sustainable and economical transportation options. The platform positions itself as a niche player in the transportation sector, emphasizing openness and community values. Technically, the website is hosted by OVH and uses HTTPS with a moderate performance profile. It employs Matomo analytics with a consent-based tracking mechanism, reflecting a privacy-conscious approach. The site uses modern web fonts and icons but does not appear to rely on a major CMS or framework. Mobile optimization and SEO are adequately addressed, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and respects user consent for analytics. However, it lacks explicit security headers and formal security policies such as a privacy policy, terms of service, or vulnerability disclosure. No contact information or incident response channels are clearly provided, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, Mobicoop.fr presents a trustworthy and professional online presence for its business model but would benefit from enhanced transparency in privacy and security policies, as well as improved contact and incident response information to strengthen its security posture and compliance with regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mobicoop.fr

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mobicoop operates in the transportation sector, focusing on carpooling services that are free and commission-free, appealing to environmentally conscious and cost-sensitive users in France. Its business model is community-driven, likely relying on user engagement rather than direct monetization. The company appears small but stable, with a domain age consistent with its founding year. The lack of visible partnerships or subsidiaries suggests a focused operational scope. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its open and free approach to ride sharing, differentiating it from commercial competitors. Growth potential may depend on expanding user base and geographic reach within France or beyond.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and user consent is respected for analytics tracking, which is a positive privacy practice. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others indicates room for improvement in hardening the site against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits the ability to manage security incidents effectively. The lack of a published privacy policy and terms of service also represents a compliance gap, particularly under GDPR. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, enhancing security policies and technical controls would improve the security posture significantly.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web attacks.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security and abuse contacts to build trust and enable effective communication.
  5. Regularly review and update the website's security and privacy practices to align with evolving regulations and best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mobicoop
Description
Pour un covoiturage sans commission, gratuit et libre, utilisez Mobicoop.fr! Au quotidien ou pour des trajets occasionnels, le covoiturage doit être un bien commun
Key services
Carpooling platform, Free and commission-free ride sharing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Matomo Analytics, Poppins font, Material Design Icons, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Consent-based analytics tracking

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage content provided.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with Matomo analytics respecting user consent.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Website uses HTTPS and is hosted by OVH, a known hosting provider.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No business certifications or security frameworks mentioned.
  8. Content is focused on free and commission-free carpooling in France.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. No advertising networks detected; minimal tracking with user consent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern but lightweight technical stack with custom fonts (Poppins) and Material Design Icons. It integrates Matomo analytics with a consent mechanism, indicating attention to privacy. Hosting is provided by OVH, a reputable provider. The site appears to be custom-built or uses minimal frameworks, with no major CMS detected. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. Opportunities exist to enhance technical robustness by adding security headers and improving accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mobicoop.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mobicoop.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.