Skip to main content

Security report for mmdltd.com

Maisons Marques et Domaines Limited · Retail · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Maisons Marques et Domaines Limited is a UK-based wine importer and distributor specializing in premium French and international wines, established in 1986 by Champagne Louis Roederer. The company maintains a strong market position within the UK wine trade, representing a portfolio of prestigious wine producers. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting wine trade professionals and importers. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern web technologies including jQuery and Google Analytics, offering good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented; however, the absence of security headers and incident response information indicates room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration transparency, although the website content and business information appear legitimate. Overall, the website scores well in content quality and privacy compliance but should address security and domain legitimacy gaps to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mmdltd.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail sector focusing on wine importation and distribution, leveraging a portfolio of high-quality wine brands. Their business model centers on agency representation and portfolio management for premium wine producers, targeting UK wine trade professionals and distributors. The website demonstrates a solid partnership ecosystem with industry organizations and maintains active social media channels for brand engagement. Growth indicators include recent news updates and portfolio expansions. The company’s operations appear stable with a medium-sized business footprint and a well-established market presence since 1986. However, the missing WHOIS data introduces uncertainty regarding domain ownership transparency, which could impact stakeholder trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting a baseline security posture aligned with privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness and could be a risk factor. Overall, the security posture is moderate but would benefit from enhanced security controls, transparency, and incident readiness to mitigate potential risks and improve compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen site security.
  2. Publish a clear incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to minimize vulnerabilities and technical debt.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Maisons Marques et Domaines Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Maisons Marques et Domaines Limited
Description
Maisons Marques et Domaines was established in 1986 by Champagne Louis Roederer, one of the last truly independent family-owned houses in Champagne.
Key services
Wine importation, Wine distribution, Portfolio management, Wine brand representation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, WordPress, PHP, CSS3, HTML5, Google Analytics
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google Analytics with IP anonymization
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear business focus on wine importation and distribution.
  3. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  6. Social media presence is active on major platforms.
  7. No contact emails explicitly found in HTML; phone number and physical address are present.
  8. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the WordPress CMS platform, utilizing jQuery and standard web technologies such as HTML5 and CSS3. Google Analytics is integrated with IP anonymization for user tracking. The site loads with moderate performance and is optimized for mobile devices. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, the absence of security headers and limited accessibility features suggest technical debt and opportunities for modernization. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but should be enhanced for improved security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mmdltd.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mmdltd.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.