Skip to main content

Security report for mm-com.de

MMcom GmbH · Transportation · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MMcom GmbH is a medium-sized IT service provider based in Hof, Germany, operating as a subsidiary of the M&M Militzer & Münch Gruppe, a large logistics company. The company specializes in IT projects, consulting, support, security, system integration, and hosting services, serving both the parent group and external clients. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and compliance with GDPR and cookie regulations. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, including reCAPTCHA for spam protection. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced, though some HTTP security headers are missing and no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published. Overall, the domain registration is consistent with the business claims, though WHOIS data is limited due to DENIC privacy policies. The website is accessible without WAF blocking and contains no suspicious or adult content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mm-com.de

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
45
Email security
62
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MMcom GmbH holds a strong position as an internal IT system house for a large logistics group, leveraging this relationship to provide comprehensive IT and hosting services. Their business model focuses on full-service IT solutions, including hosting, server housing, and communication platforms like Hosted Exchange. The company targets businesses needing reliable IT infrastructure, especially within logistics and related sectors. The presence of client logos and detailed contact info enhances trust. The website's multilingual capabilities and professional design support their market presence. No direct revenue streams or certifications are disclosed, but the company benefits from the parent group's scale and reputation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and integration of Google reCAPTCHA on contact forms to mitigate spam and abuse. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No published security policy or incident response contacts limit transparency and preparedness communication. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The security score is good but could be improved by implementing recommended headers and publishing security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MMcom GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MMcom GmbH
Description
MMcom GmbH is a subsidiary of M&M Militzer & Münch Gruppe, a logistics service provider with over 2,000 employees at 100 locations in more than 30 countries. MMcom operates an internal IT system house in Hof, Germany, providing IT projects, support, consulting, security, system integration, hosting, and communication services for the group and external clients.
Key services
IT projects and consulting, IT support and security, System integration and operation, Hosting (webhosting, server housing, CMS), Communication services (Hosted Exchange, Web Conferencing)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, PHP, jQuery, jQuery UI, FontAwesome 6.5.1, Bootstrap 4+, Google reCAPTCHA v3, WPML (multilingual plugin), Contact Form 7, Autoptimize
Frameworks
OnePress WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on contact form
  • Cookie consent banner with GDPR compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
WP Statistics (WordPress plugin)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and business-focused with clear contact and legal information.
  3. Strong GDPR and cookie compliance with visible consent mechanisms.
  4. Use of modern WordPress technologies and plugins with reCAPTCHA integration.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  6. WHOIS data is limited due to DENIC privacy rules but consistent with business claims.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 using the OnePress theme and several plugins including Contact Form 7, WPML for multilingual support, and Autoptimize for performance optimization. It uses jQuery and Bootstrap frameworks, FontAwesome icons, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection. The site loads external resources from trusted domains such as ajax.googleapis.com and gstatic.com. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting provider details are not explicitly disclosed. Overall, the technical stack is modern and well-maintained but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mm-com.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mm-com.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.