Skip to main content

Security report for mjanpawel2.pl

cyber_Folks S.A. · Non-profit · Poland

High risk. 14 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

34/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Muzeum Jana Pawła II Wielkiego w Krakowie is a small, non-profit cultural institution dedicated to preserving and promoting the legacy of Pope John Paul II. Founded in 2020, it offers modern exhibitions, educational programs, and VR cinema experiences targeting a broad audience including tourists, educational groups, and the religious community. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with a modern tech stack and good mobile optimization. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent mechanisms, reflecting GDPR compliance. Security posture is good with HTTPS and security headers, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security policy or incident response information is published. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-maintained, with active social media presence and clear business focus.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

14 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mjanpawel2.pl

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
32
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
34

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The museum occupies a niche cultural and religious market in Poland, leveraging digital tools like VR and online educational materials to engage visitors. Its business model is non-profit, focusing on cultural preservation and education rather than commercial sales, though it includes an online shop. Partnerships with related domains suggest a collaborative ecosystem. The domain age aligns with the museum's founding date, supporting legitimacy. The website's content and structure indicate a stable and credible operation with growth potential in digital engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, multiple security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of DNSSEC and a published security policy or incident response contact reduces overall security maturity. No security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure mechanism is present, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability management. The use of common WordPress plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate plugin-related vulnerabilities. Overall, the site is secure but could improve transparency and DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance HTTP security headers with Content Security Policy (CSP) reporting to reduce XSS risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
cyber_Folks S.A.
Description
Muzeum Świętego Jana Pawła II Wielkiego w Krakowie Białych Morzach, dedicated to preserving and promoting the life and legacy of Karol Wojtyła (John Paul II), featuring modern exhibitions and unique papal gifts.
Key services
Museum exhibitions, Educational programs, Guided tours, VR cinema experiences, Event hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Google Analytics, Slider Revolution, DataTables, Bootstrap
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained cultural museum site.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and modern tech stack.
  3. Has multi-language support with hreflang tags.
  4. Includes privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube.
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  8. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security gap.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, using popular libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, DataTables, and Slider Revolution. It employs Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site is hosted by cyber_Folks S.A., a reputable Polish hosting provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and hreflang for multilingual support. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from performance optimizations and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mjanpawel2.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mjanpawel2.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.