Skip to main content

Security report for mixlr.com

Mixlr Ltd · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mixlr Ltd operates a specialized live audio broadcasting platform that enables users to create, distribute, and host professional-quality live audio streams globally. Founded in 2010, the company has established itself as a trusted provider in the live audio streaming niche, serving diverse audiences including sports teams, podcasters, educators, and faith groups. The platform emphasizes ease of use, reliability, and professional sound quality without the complexity of traditional broadcasting tools. Technically, Mixlr leverages a modern tech stack including Ruby on Rails, Turbo, StimulusJS, and AWS infrastructure with Cloudfront CDN, ensuring fast and scalable performance. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, though improvements such as enabling DNSSEC and publishing explicit security policies could enhance trust further. Privacy compliance is evident through a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. Overall, Mixlr presents a credible, professional, and secure online presence with moderate user tracking for analytics and marketing purposes.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mixlr.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mixlr holds a strong market position as a dedicated live audio streaming platform, differentiating itself from video-centric competitors. Its subscription-based business model, with a free beginner plan, supports steady revenue streams while maintaining user control over the listening experience. The company targets broadcasters across multiple sectors including sports, live events, education, and faith communities, supported by notable clients and case studies. The presence of customer testimonials and well-known brand logos enhances credibility. Mixlr's partnership ecosystem includes integrations with social media and analytics platforms, though no direct partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The company demonstrates growth potential through its technical infrastructure and global reach, engaging over 1.7 billion listeners and 190 countries as per website statistics.

Security posture

Mixlr exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, clientTransferProhibited domain status, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of published security or incident response policies represent areas for improvement. No known vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the website content. The site uses secure forms with CSRF tokens, indicating attention to input security. Tracking scripts are limited to reputable analytics and marketing tools. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing vulnerability disclosure and incident response communications.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response contacts to improve transparency.
  3. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  5. Maintain regular security audits and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mixlr Ltd
Description
Mixlr is a platform that enables users to broadcast live audio easily and professionally to a global audience. It offers tools to create channels, distribute streams, and host live audio events with real-time chat.
Key services
Live audio broadcasting, Branded event pages, Embedding streams on websites and apps, Recording and sharing broadcasts
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Cloudfront CDN, Google Fonts, Facebook Pixel, Mixpanel analytics
Frameworks
Turbo (Hotwire), StimulusJS
Platforms
Web, Windows, MacOS, Android, iOS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Mixpanel, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Mixpanel
Marketing tools
Mixpanel, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on live audio streaming with clear business model.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage HTML.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook, X (Twitter), Instagram.
  5. Cookie consent banner present indicating GDPR awareness.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies found on homepage.
  7. WHOIS data shows domain is well maintained and not privacy protected.
  8. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and robust technology stack featuring Ruby on Rails with Turbo and StimulusJS for frontend interactivity. Hosting on AWS with Cloudfront CDN ensures high availability and fast content delivery. The site is mobile-optimized and uses Google Fonts for typography. Analytics and marketing are handled via Mixpanel and Facebook Pixel, integrated asynchronously to minimize performance impact. The HTML is well-structured with proper meta tags and Open Graph data for SEO and social sharing. Performance is fast with no blocking scripts detected. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced with ARIA roles and landmarks. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mixlr.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mixlr.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.