Skip to main content

Security report for mitsubishi.lv

SKANDI MOTORS · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Skandi Motors is a well-established automotive business in Latvia, specializing in the sale of new and used vehicles as well as providing automotive service and maintenance. With over 21 years of experience and a client base exceeding 63,000, the company holds a strong market position as one of the leading car dealers and service providers in the region. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting Latvian consumers and businesses interested in automotive products and services. Technically, the site is built on WordPress and integrates modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is mobile optimized and includes structured data to enhance SEO.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mitsubishi.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates primarily in the transportation sector, focusing on retail and service of automobiles. Its business model revolves around direct sales and after-sales services, targeting a broad audience in Latvia. The presence of extensive marketing and tracking tools indicates a data-driven approach to customer engagement and advertising. The lack of visible contact information on the homepage suggests that contact details may be located deeper within the site or handled via forms. The company does not publicly disclose privacy or security policies on the main page, which could be improved to enhance transparency. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the domain or content analysis.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, demonstrating awareness of privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no published security policy or incident response contact information. The use of third-party marketing and analytics scripts introduces potential privacy and security risks if not properly managed. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were observed in the HTML content. The security posture is moderate but could be strengthened by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Add explicit security policy and incident response contact information to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting and incident management.
  4. Conduct regular security audits to identify and remediate any vulnerable libraries or outdated components.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet international standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SKANDI MOTORS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SKANDI MOTORS
Description
Viens no vadošajiem jaunu un mazlietotu auto tirgotājiem un servisa pakalpojumu sniedzējiem Latvijā - ar 21 gadu pieredzi un 63000 klientiem.
Key services
New car sales, Used car sales, Automotive service and maintenance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery UI, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https)
  • Cookie consent banner with granular consent options
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Meta Platforms, Inc., Leadfeeder
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
CallGear, LiveChat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern cookie consent management.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent with detailed cookie categories and providers.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers explicitly labeled on homepage HTML.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided HTML content.
  5. Multiple external marketing and analytics scripts loaded, indicating extensive user tracking.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  8. Website content is in Latvian with alternate Russian language version indicated.
  9. Structured data (JSON-LD) present for organization and webpage enhancing SEO.
  10. No signs of adult or NSFW content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS and uses common web technologies such as jQuery UI and Google Fonts. It integrates multiple third-party services for marketing, analytics, and customer interaction, including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LiveChat, and CallGear. Cookiebot is used for cookie consent management, providing granular control over cookie categories. The site appears to have moderate performance and good mobile optimization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and JSON-LD structured data. However, no hosting provider or server infrastructure details were identified from the HTML content. The site would benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mitsubishi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mitsubishi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.