Skip to main content

Security report for misereor.de

Misereor · Non-profit · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Misereor is a well-established German Catholic non-profit organization dedicated to global development and social justice. The website serves as a comprehensive platform for informing the public, facilitating donations, and promoting advocacy campaigns. It targets donors, partners, and socially conscious individuals, offering detailed project information and engagement opportunities. The organization maintains a strong market position within the German and international development NGO sector, emphasizing transparency and partnership. Technically, the website is built on the TYPO3 CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Bootstrap and FontAwesome Pro for styling and icons. It employs Usercentrics for cookie consent management, ensuring GDPR compliance. Hosting is inferred to be with NetCologne, a reputable German provider. The site demonstrates good performance, excellent mobile optimization, and solid SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and integrates consent management for privacy compliance. While explicit security headers are not fully confirmed, no vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact is noted as an area for improvement. Overall, the security posture is strong for a non-profit organization. The website content is safe for general audiences, focusing on charitable activities without any adult or questionable material. The domain WHOIS data aligns with the organization's profile, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness. No WAF or blocking mechanisms interfere with content accessibility, allowing full analysis. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing a formal security policy and vulnerability disclosure process, and continuing to maintain transparency and user trust through clear contact and privacy information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching misereor.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Misereor operates as a large, essential non-profit entity within the global development sector, focusing on poverty alleviation, social justice, and ecological sustainability. Its business model relies on donations, partnerships, and advocacy. The website reflects a mature digital presence with multilingual support and extensive content targeting donors, activists, and partners. The organization leverages partnerships (e.g., 2-euro-aktion.de) and maintains active social media channels to broaden reach and engagement. The site’s comprehensive project listings and donation facilitation tools indicate a well-structured fundraising ecosystem. Growth indicators include active campaigns, events, and educational resources. The organization’s transparent approach and professional branding reinforce its competitive advantage in the NGO space.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, consent-based cookie management, and secure form handling via TYPO3 CMS. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not clearly present, representing a potential area for enhancement. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. GDPR compliance is well addressed through Usercentrics integration and privacy policy availability. Overall, the security culture appears adequate for the organization's risk profile but could benefit from formalized policies and improved header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Continue maintaining and updating cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to avoid inclusion of vulnerable components.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Misereor
Description
Misereor is a German Catholic development organization supporting people worldwide where poverty is greatest, focusing on social and ecological justice.
Key services
Development aid projects, Fundraising and donation management, Advocacy and awareness campaigns, Educational materials and events
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Bootstrap CSS, FontAwesome Pro, Usercentrics Consent Manager, JavaScript modules
Frameworks
TYPO3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure forms with CSRF tokens (implied by TYPO3)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Usercentrics
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Manager, Marketing Cloud (FpMarketingcloud)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed, content-rich platform for a German non-profit development organization.
  2. Strong focus on transparency, donation facilitation, and social justice topics.
  3. Use of modern CMS TYPO3 and consent management tools indicates digital maturity.
  4. No signs of malicious content or security issues in the provided data.
  5. Comprehensive navigation and multilingual support (German and English).
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used open-source content management system, indicating a mature technical infrastructure. The use of Bootstrap and FontAwesome Pro supports responsive design and rich iconography, contributing to excellent mobile optimization and user experience. Usercentrics is integrated for cookie consent management, reflecting attention to privacy compliance. Hosting via NetCologne suggests reliable German-based infrastructure. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in asset delivery and caching. The site includes structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided scripts. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with opportunities for incremental improvements in performance and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with misereor.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review misereor.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.