Skip to main content

Security report for miljofyrtarn.no

Stiftelsen Miljøfyrtårn · Non-profit · Norway

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stiftelsen Miljøfyrtårn is a leading Norwegian non-profit organization specializing in environmental certification and sustainability services. The organization provides the Miljøfyrtårn certification, a recognized environmental certification in Norway, along with sustainability tools such as LUMA. Their target audience primarily includes Norwegian businesses and organizations seeking to improve their environmental impact and comply with sustainability standards. The website reflects a strong market position as a trusted certification body with a comprehensive offering including consulting, training, and certification management. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Gravity Forms for data collection, UIkit for frontend framework, and integrates analytics tools like Google Analytics and Hotjar. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, demonstrating a mature digital infrastructure. The presence of GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies further indicates attention to regulatory compliance. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and implements cookie consent mechanisms. While explicit security headers are not fully evident, no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The absence of WHOIS data is likely due to privacy protection common in Norwegian domains and does not detract from the site's legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced with additional headers and a published vulnerability disclosure policy. The overall risk assessment is low, with the website presenting a professional, trustworthy, and compliant digital presence. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response information, and maintaining regular security audits to sustain trust and compliance in the evolving regulatory landscape.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching miljofyrtarn.no

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Stiftelsen Miljøfyrtårn operates as a non-profit environmental certification body in Norway, holding a leading position in the market. Their business model focuses on providing certification services, sustainability tools, and consulting to organizations aiming to improve environmental performance. Revenue streams likely include certification fees, consulting services, and training programs. The organization targets Norwegian businesses across sectors interested in sustainability compliance and environmental responsibility. The website indicates a medium-sized operation with regional offices in Kristiansand and Oslo. Partnerships with organizations like Eco-Lighthouse and a visible social media presence support their ecosystem. The company demonstrates growth through digital tools like LUMA and active content marketing via news and case studies. Overall, the organization shows strategic alignment with sustainability trends and regulatory demands in Norway.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. Use of reputable analytics and tracking tools is balanced with privacy notices and opt-out links. No critical security headers were explicitly detected, suggesting room for improvement in defense-in-depth. The site does not expose sensitive information in HTML or scripts and uses iframe sandboxing for form submissions. Absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. The WHOIS privacy protection is typical for the domain type and does not raise concerns. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and providing clear incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits and update WordPress core and plugins promptly to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider creating and publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Enhance user privacy controls and data retention disclosures to align with evolving GDPR and NIS2 requirements.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Stiftelsen Miljøfyrtårn
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stiftelsen Miljøfyrtårn
Description
Norges ledende miljøsertifisering. Bli Miljøfyrtårn. Nytt verktøy forenkler bærekraftsarbeidet.
Key services
Environmental certification (Miljøfyrtårn), Sustainability tools (LUMA), Consulting and training, Certification criteria and re-certification, Public awareness and promotion
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Gravity Forms plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, UIkit framework, Yootheme theme, Popup Maker plugin, GDPR plugin
Frameworks
UIkit, Gravity Forms
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics with opt-out link
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of iframe sandbox for form submission

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Jetpack Stats, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Jetpack Stats
Marketing tools
Hotjar, Emarketeer (newsletter)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to environmental certification.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie policy presence with GDPR compliance.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical addresses.
  6. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection by Norid.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn supports trustworthiness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with a modern tech stack including Gravity Forms for form management, UIkit for frontend UI components, and Yootheme for theming. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN-hosted assets. The presence of GDPR compliance plugins and cookie consent banners indicates attention to privacy regulations. Technical risks include the lack of explicit security headers and potential plugin vulnerabilities if not regularly updated. Hosting provider details are not evident from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional web presence with opportunities for security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 64/100 +3Medium31 findingsView report
  2. 61/100 −3Medium34 findingsView report
  3. 64/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with miljofyrtarn.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review miljofyrtarn.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.