Skip to main content

Security report for mile-logistics.eu

Mile Logistics · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mile Logistics is an international logistics company based in Riga, Latvia, offering a comprehensive range of freight forwarding and logistics services primarily targeting legal entities worldwide. Their services include automotive, maritime, rail, and air freight, customs clearance, warehousing, and foreign economic activity support. The company positions itself as a reliable partner with global reach covering over 120 countries, emphasizing personalized service and budget flexibility. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and optimized using WP Rocket, featuring modern SEO practices and structured data for enhanced search visibility. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and reCAPTCHA integration, though cookie consent mechanisms and explicit security policies are absent. Overall, the site reflects a professional, trustworthy business with good digital maturity and compliance, suitable for B2B logistics clients.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 14 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mile-logistics.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
25
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mile Logistics operates in the transportation sector with a medium-sized business model focused on B2B international logistics solutions. Their competitive advantages include a broad service portfolio, global operational coverage, and a professional team. The company leverages digital tools for customer engagement, including multilingual support and online consultation forms with GDPR-compliant consent. While no direct revenue data is available, the extensive service offerings and geographic reach suggest a stable growth trajectory. The absence of partner or subsidiary domains indicates a focused brand presence. Strategic observations highlight the importance of enhancing privacy compliance and publishing formal security and terms policies to strengthen trust and legal standing.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of multiple security headers, and use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from spam and abuse. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents a compliance gap. The absence of a cookie consent banner may also expose the company to regulatory risks under EU cookie laws. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business type but could be improved by formalizing policies and enhancing user privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with EU cookie regulations and enhance user privacy transparency.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing data protection measures and incident response procedures.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify legal terms and conditions for website users and clients.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Mile Logistics
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mile Logistics
Description
Международная логистическая компания, осуществляющая полный комплекс логистических услуг для юридических лиц, включая международные перевозки грузов, таможенное оформление, складские услуги и сопровождение ВЭД.
Key services
Автомобильные перевозки, Морские перевозки, Железнодорожные перевозки, Авиаперевозки, Мультимодальные перевозки, Контейнерные перевозки, Негабаритные перевозки, Сборные грузы, Таможенное оформление, Складские услуги
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Jet Engine, WP Rocket, jQuery
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA v3 on forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO, WP Rocket
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Russian with English alternate language available.
  3. Comprehensive structured data (JSON-LD) is implemented for SEO and contact info.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone numbers, emails, and physical address.
  5. Forms include GDPR-compliant consent checkbox and use reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection.
  6. No explicit cookie consent banner found, which may be a compliance gap.
  7. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  8. No public vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  9. Website uses modern WordPress technologies and performance optimization plugins.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor for page building and Jet Engine for dynamic content. Performance optimization is handled by WP Rocket, which includes lazy loading and script deferral. The site uses jQuery libraries and includes structured data in JSON-LD format for SEO enhancement. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and alternate language support. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No hosting provider details were found in the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and performant user experience with room for further modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mile-logistics.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mile-logistics.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.