Skip to main content

Security report for migbaltic.lv

MIG Baltic · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MIG Baltic is a Latvian wholesale distributor specializing in non-food products such as hand tools, power tools, garden tools, and work tables. Established in 2009, the company has positioned itself as a reliable supplier in the wholesale market, offering professional customer service and an online ordering platform (eMIG.lv). The website is primarily in Latvian with multilingual support, targeting professional buyers and wholesale customers in the tools and hardware sector. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including JavaScript libraries like Leaflet.js for mapping and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Woopra, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS usage and secure form submission, but lacks visible security headers and incident response information. Privacy compliance is limited due to the absence of explicit cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching migbaltic.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MIG Baltic operates a B2B wholesale business model focused on tools and hardware products, serving professional clients primarily in Latvia and neighboring Baltic countries. The company leverages partnerships, such as with eMIG.lv for electronic ordering, to enhance customer experience. Its market position is stable with a decade-plus presence, supported by a consistent brand and client portfolio. Revenue streams likely derive from wholesale sales and special orders. The company demonstrates growth through digital ordering platforms and regular news updates. The partnership ecosystem includes recognized regional distributors and retailers. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to strengthen compliance and security posture to maintain competitive advantage and customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and secure form handling. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible incident response or security contact information, which limits readiness for handling security incidents. Privacy compliance is partial, with no cookie consent mechanism or detailed privacy policy disclosures. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of reputable analytics tools is noted, but privacy impact should be managed carefully. Overall, the security posture is functional but could benefit from enhancements in headers, policies, and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy and cookie policy with explicit user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve web security.
  3. Publish incident response and security contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience across devices.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize tracking risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MIG Baltic
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MIG Baltic
Description
MIG Baltic is a wholesale company specializing in non-food products such as hand tools, power tools, garden tools, and work tables. Founded in November 2009, it operates in the wholesale segment, offering a broad product range and professional customer service.
Key services
Wholesale distribution of hand tools, Wholesale distribution of power tools, Garden tools sales, Work tables sales, Online ordering platform (eMIG.lv)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Leaflet.js, Google Analytics, Woopra
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by URL https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Contact form uses POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Woopra
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Woopra
Marketing tools
Woopra
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional wholesale distributor site for tools and hardware
  2. Content is in Latvian with multi-language support
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with emails and phone numbers
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found, indicating compliance gaps
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and libraries like Leaflet.js for interactive maps. Analytics integration includes Google Analytics and Woopra, indicating moderate tracking capabilities. The site structure is clear with multilingual support and a functional contact form using POST method. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization, especially in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. No CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly detected. The site lacks advanced frameworks but maintains good SEO practices with meta tags and keywords. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete privacy compliance, which could impact business operations if not addressed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with migbaltic.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review migbaltic.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.