Skip to main content

Security report for michaelanthonyjewellers.com

Michael Anthony Jewellers · Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Michael Anthony Jewellers appears to be a newly established retail jewellery business with an online presence launched in June 2024. The website is minimalistic and primarily serves as a placeholder or parked domain with advertising content from Google Adsense and Bodis. There is no direct contact information or detailed business description available on the site, limiting the ability to fully assess the business model or market positioning. The target audience is likely consumers interested in jewellery products, but the site lacks engaging content or e-commerce functionality at this time. From a technical perspective, the website uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Hosting is provided via Bodis domain parking services, and the site is secured with HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers. Performance and mobile optimization are basic, and SEO features are minimal. There is no cookie consent mechanism, and privacy policies are present but basic and not clearly GDPR compliant. Security posture is weak with no visible security policies, incident response contacts, or certifications. The domain registration is recent and consistent with a new business but registered through a domain service provider rather than directly by the business. No suspicious patterns or privacy protection are noted. Overall, the site presents a low trust profile with limited business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security configurations, implementing GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies, adding clear business contact information, and developing richer content to improve user experience and trustworthiness. These steps will help transition the site from a parked domain to a credible online retail presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching michaelanthonyjewellers.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail jewellery sector with a focus on online presence. The new domain registration suggests a startup or recent launch. The business model appears to be e-commerce or online retail, but no transactional capabilities or product listings are visible. The lack of contact details and social media presence limits customer engagement and trust. The use of Bodis domain parking and Google Adsense indicates monetization through advertising rather than direct sales currently. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth potential depends on developing a full-featured website with clear branding and customer support.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low. While HTTPS is enabled, critical security headers are missing, and DNSSEC is not configured, increasing risk of DNS spoofing. No incident response or security policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR compliance indicators suggests privacy compliance gaps. No known vulnerabilities or malware were detected, but the minimal technical implementation and lack of security best practices expose the site to potential risks. The domain registration is transparent but handled by a third-party registrar, which is common but reduces direct control. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvement to meet industry standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Add clear and verifiable contact information including emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  5. Create and publish an incident response policy and provide security contact channels to improve trust and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Michael Anthony Jewellers
Description
Online presence for Michael Anthony Jewellers, likely a retail jeweller business.
Key services
Jewellery sales
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Adsense, Bodis domain parking
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, Bodis
Tracking pixels
Google Adsense cookie.js
Marketing tools
Google Adsense
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website appears to be a parked or placeholder site with minimal content.
  2. No visible contact information or company details beyond basic footer links.
  3. No forms or interactive elements detected.
  4. No social media links or email addresses found.
  5. Site uses Google Adsense and Bodis domain parking services.
  6. No advanced SEO or accessibility features detected.
  7. No security headers or advanced security configurations present.
  8. Privacy and cookie policies exist but are minimal and lack GDPR compliance indicators.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without any detected CMS or advanced frameworks. It relies on Bodis domain parking services for hosting and monetization through Google Adsense advertising. The site lacks modern SEO and accessibility features and has only basic mobile optimization. Performance is moderate but could be improved with optimization. The absence of security headers and DNSSEC indicates technical debt in security configuration. There is an opportunity to modernize the technical stack by adopting a CMS, improving content management, and implementing security best practices to reduce operational risks and enhance user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with michaelanthonyjewellers.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review michaelanthonyjewellers.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.